Development and adaptation of methods for PAHs extraction from bottom sediments using subcritical water extraction, saponification, and ultrasound extraction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are persistent organic pollutants that pose significant environmental and health risks due to their widespread distribution and carcinogenic properties. Developing efficient and environmentally friendly extraction methods for PAHs from complex matrices like bottom sediments is essential for advancing pollution monitoring and mitigation efforts. The influence of temperature and time parameters of water in a subcritical state on the extraction of widespread, contrasting in physicochemical properties polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from bottom sediment samples of the Lena River with varying initial pollutant content was studied. It was shown that the optimal extraction parameters for naphthalene are 240°C for 20 minutes, for phenanthrene and fluoranthene – 240°C for 30 minutes, for benzo(a)pyrene – 250°C for 30 minutes, and for benzo(g,h,i)perylene – 260°C for 40 minutes. Under these conditions, the proportion of extracted PAHs varies from 76% to 85%. A comparison was conducted of widely used PAH extraction methods based on the use of toxic solvents from standard techniques. It was established that the efficiency of extraction methods can be ranked as follows: ultrasound extraction > subcritical extraction > saponification method. In this case, the value of the PAH extraction coefficient during subcritical extraction was 1.23-1.29, during saponification - 1.35 and 1.34, and during the ultrasonic extraction method - 1.10 and 1.08.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS)
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.1618846
Primary Topic
Analytical chemistry methods development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and adaptation of methods for PAHs extraction from bottom sediments using subcritical water extraction, saponification, and ultrasound extraction

Tamara Dudnikova, Andrey Barbashev, Kristina Prokopeva, Elena Antonenko et al.
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS)
Analytical chemistry methods development
article

Development and adaptation of methods for PAHs extraction from bottom sediments using subcritical water extraction, saponification, and ultrasound extraction

Tamara Dudnikova, Andrey Barbashev, Kristina Prokopeva, Elena Antonenko, Anastasia Nemtseva, Tatiana Minkina, Svetlana N Sushkova, Sergey Chalov, Evgenyi Shuvaev
article en

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are persistent organic pollutants that pose significant environmental and health risks due to their widespread distribution and carcinogenic properties. Developing efficient and environmentally friendly extraction methods for PAHs from complex matrices like bottom sediments is essential for advancing pollution monitoring and mitigation efforts. The influence of temperature and time parameters of water in a subcritical state on the extraction of widespread, contrasting in physicochemical properties polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from bottom sediment samples of the Lena River with varying initial pollutant content was studied. It was shown that the optimal extraction parameters for naphthalene are 240°C for 20 minutes, for phenanthrene and fluoranthene – 240°C for 30 minutes, for benzo(a)pyrene – 250°C for 30 minutes, and for benzo(g,h,i)perylene – 260°C for 40 minutes. Under these conditions, the proportion of extracted PAHs varies from 76% to 85%. A comparison was conducted of widely used PAH extraction methods based on the use of toxic solvents from standard techniques. It was established that the efficiency of extraction methods can be ranked as follows: ultrasound extraction > subcritical extraction > saponification method. In this case, the value of the PAH extraction coefficient during subcritical extraction was 1.23-1.29, during saponification - 1.35 and 1.34, and during the ultrasonic extraction method - 1.10 and 1.08.

EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS)Vol. 14(2)
Southern Federal University (RU), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Analytical chemistry methods development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.