La noción de ‘amenaza futura’ en la jurisprudencia chilena: análisis del recurso de protección en defensa de los territorios indígenas

The environmental crisis is a significant problem impacting our planet, and indigenous territories in Chile also suffer its consequences. The extractivist model, which invades, exploits, and contaminates the Earth, endangers the ways of life and health of indigenous communities. This article aims to critically analyse the notion of 'threat' as interpreted and applied by the Valdivia Court of Appeals in a recent ruling. The case involves a protection claim filed by the Mapuche Huilliche community against the Ministry of Public Works. The court denied the constitutional protection action, and the uniqueness of the decision lies in the concept of threat used by the Court. What's innovative is the idea of a 'future threat' in a preventive manner, meaning the protection claim is filed before the threat materializes. This would expand the scope of the protection remedy. The consequence of using this concept is that it extends the remedy to cases that are not currently covered.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vergentis
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12800/vg.19.9
Primary Topic
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La noción de ‘amenaza futura’ en la jurisprudencia chilena: análisis del recurso de protección en defensa de los territorios indígenas

Alessia Baghino
Vergentis
Legal processes and jurisprudence
article

La noción de ‘amenaza futura’ en la jurisprudencia chilena: análisis del recurso de protección en defensa de los territorios indígenas

Alessia Baghino
article en

Abstract

The environmental crisis is a significant problem impacting our planet, and indigenous territories in Chile also suffer its consequences. The extractivist model, which invades, exploits, and contaminates the Earth, endangers the ways of life and health of indigenous communities. This article aims to critically analyse the notion of 'threat' as interpreted and applied by the Valdivia Court of Appeals in a recent ruling. The case involves a protection claim filed by the Mapuche Huilliche community against the Ministry of Public Works. The court denied the constitutional protection action, and the uniqueness of the decision lies in the concept of threat used by the Court. What's innovative is the idea of a 'future threat' in a preventive manner, meaning the protection claim is filed before the threat materializes. This would expand the scope of the protection remedy. The consequence of using this concept is that it extends the remedy to cases that are not currently covered.

Vergentis(19)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Legal processes and jurisprudence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.