"Bleiben wir beisammen, denn wir leiden ein Leiden und haben eine Aufgabe": Zu Arnold Zweigs und Stefan Zweigs Briefwechsel und ihren publizistischen Positionen zur UdSSR

Abstract: This article present the relationship between the two men, primarily based on their little-known correspondence (1919–1940; until 1937 only Arnold Zweig's letters are available). These letters contain revealing reflections on their missions as writers, literary forms, current political events (including clear-sighted prognoses by Stefan Zweig), and private matters and bear witness to an ambivalent relationship. The article also sheds light on both writers' public positions toward the Soviet Union. Arnold Zweig was a vehement critic of the dictatorial system in the beginning of the 1930s, which, according to him, betrayed the socialist idea—until he became its advocate in 1936. Stefan Zweig, on the other hand, refused to criticize the system publicly and declared it to be more progressive than the (to his mind) outdated political conditions in Europe. The article concludes with an appeal to take a more critical look at canonization processes and literary historiography.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Austrian studies
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2024.a955456
Primary Topic
German Literature and Culture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Bleiben wir beisammen, denn wir leiden ein Leiden und haben eine Aufgabe": Zu Arnold Zweigs und Stefan Zweigs Briefwechsel und ihren publizistischen Positionen zur UdSSR

Jasmin Sohnemann
Journal of Austrian studies
German Literature and Culture Studies
article

"Bleiben wir beisammen, denn wir leiden ein Leiden und haben eine Aufgabe": Zu Arnold Zweigs und Stefan Zweigs Briefwechsel und ihren publizistischen Positionen zur UdSSR

Jasmin Sohnemann
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article present the relationship between the two men, primarily based on their little-known correspondence (1919–1940; until 1937 only Arnold Zweig's letters are available). These letters contain revealing reflections on their missions as writers, literary forms, current political events (including clear-sighted prognoses by Stefan Zweig), and private matters and bear witness to an ambivalent relationship. The article also sheds light on both writers' public positions toward the Soviet Union. Arnold Zweig was a vehement critic of the dictatorial system in the beginning of the 1930s, which, according to him, betrayed the socialist idea—until he became its advocate in 1936. Stefan Zweig, on the other hand, refused to criticize the system publicly and declared it to be more progressive than the (to his mind) outdated political conditions in Europe. The article concludes with an appeal to take a more critical look at canonization processes and literary historiography.

Journal of Austrian studiesVol. 57(3-4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
German Literature and Culture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

"Bleiben wir beisammen, denn wir leiden ein Leiden und haben eine Aufgabe": Zu Arnold Zweigs und Stefan Zweigs Briefwechsel und ihren publizistischen Positionen zur UdSSR — Jasmin Sohnemann · Journal of Austrian studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS