Do Investors Care About Offsetting Carbon Risk?

Understanding the financial impact of climate change is critical for investors and portfolio managers as carbon transition risk increasingly shapes global markets. This article provides empirical evidence that investors price carbon emissions as a material risk, demanding a higher transition risk premium for firms with substantial Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. Regulatory pressures, shifting investor sentiment, and energy transition drive this premium, with proactive climate policies and higher renewable adoption reducing risk, while weak regulations and fossil fuel dependence amplify it. The authors find that carbon offset inventory can help mitigate this premium, as firms located in regions with higher offset inventory tend to experience reduced transition risk. For practitioners, these findings offer actionable insights into managing climate-related risks in portfolios. Asset managers should include carbon transition risks, emissions, regulations, and offset exposure in portfolios. As climate risks are priced into markets, understanding these factors is key to building resilient portfolios and optimizing returns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2025.1.709
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Investors Care About Offsetting Carbon Risk?

Andreas G. F. Hoepner, Yumeng Gao, Florent Rouxelin, Tushar Saini
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
article

Do Investors Care About Offsetting Carbon Risk?

Andreas G. F. Hoepner, Yumeng Gao, Florent Rouxelin, Tushar Saini
article en

Abstract

Understanding the financial impact of climate change is critical for investors and portfolio managers as carbon transition risk increasingly shapes global markets. This article provides empirical evidence that investors price carbon emissions as a material risk, demanding a higher transition risk premium for firms with substantial Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. Regulatory pressures, shifting investor sentiment, and energy transition drive this premium, with proactive climate policies and higher renewable adoption reducing risk, while weak regulations and fossil fuel dependence amplify it. The authors find that carbon offset inventory can help mitigate this premium, as firms located in regions with higher offset inventory tend to experience reduced transition risk. For practitioners, these findings offer actionable insights into managing climate-related risks in portfolios. Asset managers should include carbon transition risks, emissions, regulations, and offset exposure in portfolios. As climate risks are priced into markets, understanding these factors is key to building resilient portfolios and optimizing returns.

The Journal of Portfolio ManagementVol. 51(7)
University College Dublin (IE), California State University, Northridge (US), Florida International University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Investors Care About Offsetting Carbon Risk? — Andreas G. F. Hoepner, Yumeng Gao, et al. · The Journal of Portfolio Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS