Video Conferencing Platforms (VCPs) and the <i>Cohesive Distinctiveness</i> of Legal Proceedings

Abstract This article examines the essential difference between a hearing held in a court, physically attended by the parties and their lawyers, and a hearing held through Video Conferencing Platforms (VCPs) VCP. The premise pursued here is that virtual hearing lacks an important quality of the trial as a cultural phenomenon – cohesive distinctiveness . The poetics of the virtual hearing relies on such a different concept of space and time that it produces not an approximation of the traditional court hearing, but as a simulacrum, which undermines important elements of the legal hearing, and deprives it of its unique cultural power and function. The paper concludes with enhancing the necessity of a new digital poetics of law through which the cohesive distinctiveness of the legal process will not be reduced, but reimagined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pólemos
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/pol-2025-2012
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Video Conferencing Platforms (VCPs) and the Cohesive Distinctiveness of Legal Proceedings

Gal Amir, Shulamit Almog
Pólemos
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Video Conferencing Platforms (VCPs) and the Cohesive Distinctiveness of Legal Proceedings

Gal Amir, Shulamit Almog
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the essential difference between a hearing held in a court, physically attended by the parties and their lawyers, and a hearing held through Video Conferencing Platforms (VCPs) VCP. The premise pursued here is that virtual hearing lacks an important quality of the trial as a cultural phenomenon – cohesive distinctiveness . The poetics of the virtual hearing relies on such a different concept of space and time that it produces not an approximation of the traditional court hearing, but as a simulacrum, which undermines important elements of the legal hearing, and deprives it of its unique cultural power and function. The paper concludes with enhancing the necessity of a new digital poetics of law through which the cohesive distinctiveness of the legal process will not be reduced, but reimagined.

PólemosVol. 19(1)
University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Video Conferencing Platforms (VCPs) and the <i>Cohesive Distinctiveness</i> of Legal Proceedings — Gal Amir, Shulamit Almog · Pólemos (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS