Against Coherence
Some philosophers argue that coherence is a normatively significant type of rationality, over and above substantive rationality. The most detailed and substantive arguments are given by Alex Worsnip (2021, 2022). In this paper I will criticize his arguments. We are left with the thesis that the only type of rationality we need is substantive rationality.
Authors
- D. J. Bradley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-2698)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Logos & Episteme
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20251611
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 17.27