Mark 14:58 and the “three days” motif

Jeremias and others include the 'three days' motif in their reconstruction of Jesus's prophecy about the temple's destruction in Mark 14:58. While the arguments in the literature present a plausible case for authenticity, it is more likely an inauthentic pre-Markan innovation. Even so, its placement and form in 14:58 is surely the result of Markan redaction. In addition to arguments from redaction, literary, and structural criticism, hypothetical reconstruction of the motif's tradition history in early Christianity suggests that the addition follows a pattern of connecting Jesus's prophecy with the resurrection and growth of the Christian movement. With the designation, Mark shows how the prophecy is literally false because it misrepresents Jesus's actual teaching but is, ironically, symbolically true.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21906/rbl.3735
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mark 14:58 and the “three days” motif

Elton L. Hollon
1 citations
Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny
Classical Antiquity Studies
3.72
article

Mark 14:58 and the “three days” motif

Elton L. Hollon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Jeremias and others include the 'three days' motif in their reconstruction of Jesus's prophecy about the temple's destruction in Mark 14:58. While the arguments in the literature present a plausible case for authenticity, it is more likely an inauthentic pre-Markan innovation. Even so, its placement and form in 14:58 is surely the result of Markan redaction. In addition to arguments from redaction, literary, and structural criticism, hypothetical reconstruction of the motif's tradition history in early Christianity suggests that the addition follows a pattern of connecting Jesus's prophecy with the resurrection and growth of the Christian movement. With the designation, Mark shows how the prophecy is literally false because it misrepresents Jesus's actual teaching but is, ironically, symbolically true.

Ruch Biblijny i LiturgicznyVol. 77(4)
Ventura College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Classical Antiquity Studies
3.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.