What Is not Distinctive of Testimonial Knowledge

The views of epistemic buck-passing (also known as the deferral of epistemic challenge) has been used to argue for the epistemic distinctiveness of testimonial knowledge. The overall strategy for the argumentation is to demonstrate that the epistemic distinctiveness of testimonial knowledge depends on a distinctive feature of it, i.e., epistemic buck-passing, granted the truthfulness of any of these views of epistemic buck-passing. This paper examines these views and aims to reveal that, none of them successfully motivates the claim that epistemic buck-passing is a distinctive feature of testimonial knowledge. Hence, if we aim to argue that testimonial knowledge is an epistemically distinctive kind of knowledge, some other approach is needed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Logos & Episteme
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20251614
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is not Distinctive of Testimonial Knowledge

Jinhua He
1 citations
Logos & Episteme
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
2.82
article

What Is not Distinctive of Testimonial Knowledge

Jinhua He
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The views of epistemic buck-passing (also known as the deferral of epistemic challenge) has been used to argue for the epistemic distinctiveness of testimonial knowledge. The overall strategy for the argumentation is to demonstrate that the epistemic distinctiveness of testimonial knowledge depends on a distinctive feature of it, i.e., epistemic buck-passing, granted the truthfulness of any of these views of epistemic buck-passing. This paper examines these views and aims to reveal that, none of them successfully motivates the claim that epistemic buck-passing is a distinctive feature of testimonial knowledge. Hence, if we aim to argue that testimonial knowledge is an epistemically distinctive kind of knowledge, some other approach is needed.

Logos & EpistemeVol. 16(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.