Techno-economic feasibility assessment of parabolic trough solar collector in concentrated solar power plants using various heat transfer fluids

The selection of appropriate Heat Transfer Fluids (HTFs) for Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants is critical for optimizing performance, economic viability, and environmental sustainability. This study systematically assesses the technical, economic, and environmental feasibility of CSP plants using various HTFs in Benin City, Nigeria, through simulations conducted with the System Advisor Model (SAM). We compare the performance, financial, and environmental metrics of 30 MW and 60 MW CSP plants utilizing seven HTFs, including HITEC Solar Salt, HITEC XL, Therminol 59, Therminol 66, Pressurized Water, CALORIA HT 43, and Therminol VP-1. For the 30 MW plant, HITEC Solar Salt delivered the highest annual energy output of 103,957,136 kWh-e and a capacity factor of 44.0 %, despite having a higher Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of $0.11/kWh. Conversely, Pressurized Water exhibited the lowest LCOE at $0.108/kWh, indicating a trade-off between cost and performance. Notably, HITEC Solar Salt demonstrated superior economic performance in key metrics, achieving the highest Net Present Value ($17,907,220) and Internal Rate of Return (7.64 %). In contrast, the 60 MW plant simulations revealed CALORIA HT 43 as the most favorable HTF, yielding the best annual AC energy output of 130,105,432 kWh-e and the lowest LCOE of $0.10/kWh, although it necessitated additional energy for freeze protection. Environmental impact analysis revealed that CSP plants using these HTFs emit significantly less CO₂ compared to fossil fuel-based plants, with annual emissions ranging from 1887 to 2602 tons for 30 MW and 60 MW plants, respectively. These findings suggest that while a 30 MW CSP plant may be suitable for HTFs like HITEC Solar Salt and Therminol fluids, larger capacity CSP plants (60 MW) are better suited for Benin City's meteorological conditions, with CALORIA HT 43 standing out in terms of performance, economic, and environmental metrics. This research contributes to the understanding of HTF selection in CSP systems, providing insights for optimizing renewable energy solutions in Nigeria and similar climates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next research.
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100301
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-economic feasibility assessment of parabolic trough solar collector in concentrated solar power plants using various heat transfer fluids

Collins Chike Kwasi-Effah, Ogheneochuko Okpako, Chinedu Precious Okoh, Osesumen Okojie Micheal et al.
5 citations
Next research.
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
1.82
article

Techno-economic feasibility assessment of parabolic trough solar collector in concentrated solar power plants using various heat transfer fluids

Collins Chike Kwasi-Effah, Ogheneochuko Okpako, Chinedu Precious Okoh, Osesumen Okojie Micheal, Kelvin Okoro-Obaraye
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The selection of appropriate Heat Transfer Fluids (HTFs) for Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants is critical for optimizing performance, economic viability, and environmental sustainability. This study systematically assesses the technical, economic, and environmental feasibility of CSP plants using various HTFs in Benin City, Nigeria, through simulations conducted with the System Advisor Model (SAM). We compare the performance, financial, and environmental metrics of 30 MW and 60 MW CSP plants utilizing seven HTFs, including HITEC Solar Salt, HITEC XL, Therminol 59, Therminol 66, Pressurized Water, CALORIA HT 43, and Therminol VP-1. For the 30 MW plant, HITEC Solar Salt delivered the highest annual energy output of 103,957,136 kWh-e and a capacity factor of 44.0 %, despite having a higher Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of $0.11/kWh. Conversely, Pressurized Water exhibited the lowest LCOE at $0.108/kWh, indicating a trade-off between cost and performance. Notably, HITEC Solar Salt demonstrated superior economic performance in key metrics, achieving the highest Net Present Value ($17,907,220) and Internal Rate of Return (7.64 %). In contrast, the 60 MW plant simulations revealed CALORIA HT 43 as the most favorable HTF, yielding the best annual AC energy output of 130,105,432 kWh-e and the lowest LCOE of $0.10/kWh, although it necessitated additional energy for freeze protection. Environmental impact analysis revealed that CSP plants using these HTFs emit significantly less CO₂ compared to fossil fuel-based plants, with annual emissions ranging from 1887 to 2602 tons for 30 MW and 60 MW plants, respectively. These findings suggest that while a 30 MW CSP plant may be suitable for HTFs like HITEC Solar Salt and Therminol fluids, larger capacity CSP plants (60 MW) are better suited for Benin City's meteorological conditions, with CALORIA HT 43 standing out in terms of performance, economic, and environmental metrics. This research contributes to the understanding of HTF selection in CSP systems, providing insights for optimizing renewable energy solutions in Nigeria and similar climates.

Next research.Vol. 2(2)
University of Alberta (CA), University of Benin (NG)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.