MRI-based Radiomic Features for Risk Stratification of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial)

Background Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonlethal, preinvasive breast cancer for which breast MRI is best suited for accurate disease extent characterization. DCIS is often overtreated, necessitating robust models for improved risk stratification. Purpose To develop logistic regression models using clinical and MRI-based radiomic features of DCIS and to evaluate the performance of such models in predicting disease upstaging at surgery and DCIS score. Materials and Methods This study is a secondary analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI data from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, or ECOG-ACRIN, E4112 trial. Primary analysis focused on predicting disease upstaging (<i>n</i> = 295), and secondary analysis focused on predicting DCIS score (<i>n</i> = 174). Radiologist-drawn lesion segmentations and publicly available Cancer Phenomics Toolkit, or CaPTk, software was used to compute 65 radiomic features. Participants were clustered into groups based on their radiomic features (ie, radiomic phenotypes), and principal component analysis was used to summarize the feature space. Clinical information and qualitative MRI features were available. Associations were tested using χ<sup>2</sup> and likelihood ratio tests. Data were split into training and test sets with a 3:2 ratio, and model performance was assessed on the test set using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Data from 297 female participants with median age of 60 years (IQR, 51-67 years) were analyzed. Two radiomic phenotypes were identified that were associated with disease upstaging (<i>P</i> = .007). For predicting disease upstaging, the top three radiomic principal components combined with clinical and qualitative MRI predictors yielded the highest AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.88) among all tested models (<i>P</i> = .007), identifying 25% more true-negative (49 of 93 true-negative findings, 53% specificity) findings, compared with using clinical information alone (23 of 93 true-negative findings, 28% specificity). Radiomic models were not predictive of the DCIS score (<i>P</i> > .05). Conclusion In patients with DCIS, combining radiomic metrics with clinical information improved prediction of disease upstaging but not DCIS score. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02352883 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> ©RSNA, 2025 See also the editorial by Kim and Woo in this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.241628
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MRI-based Radiomic Features for Risk Stratification of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial)

Hannah Horng, Debosmita Biswas, Savannah C. Partridge, Justin Romanoff et al.
2 citations
Radiology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
2.72
article

MRI-based Radiomic Features for Risk Stratification of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial)

Hannah Horng, Debosmita Biswas, Savannah C. Partridge, Justin Romanoff, Derrick W. Spell, Rhea Chitalia, Antonio C. Wolff, Ruya Kang, Anum S. Kazerouni, Michael Hirano, Habib Rahbar, Vivian Belenky, Jennifer Xiao, Christopher Comstock, Despina Kontos, Constantine Gatsonis, Jon A. Steingrimsson, Ralph L. Corsetti, Seema A. Khan, Kalina P. Slavkova, Joseph A. Sparano, Constance D. Lehman, Sara H. Javid
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonlethal, preinvasive breast cancer for which breast MRI is best suited for accurate disease extent characterization. DCIS is often overtreated, necessitating robust models for improved risk stratification. Purpose To develop logistic regression models using clinical and MRI-based radiomic features of DCIS and to evaluate the performance of such models in predicting disease upstaging at surgery and DCIS score. Materials and Methods This study is a secondary analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI data from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, or ECOG-ACRIN, E4112 trial. Primary analysis focused on predicting disease upstaging (<i>n</i> = 295), and secondary analysis focused on predicting DCIS score (<i>n</i> = 174). Radiologist-drawn lesion segmentations and publicly available Cancer Phenomics Toolkit, or CaPTk, software was used to compute 65 radiomic features. Participants were clustered into groups based on their radiomic features (ie, radiomic phenotypes), and principal component analysis was used to summarize the feature space. Clinical information and qualitative MRI features were available. Associations were tested using χ<sup>2</sup> and likelihood ratio tests. Data were split into training and test sets with a 3:2 ratio, and model performance was assessed on the test set using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Data from 297 female participants with median age of 60 years (IQR, 51-67 years) were analyzed. Two radiomic phenotypes were identified that were associated with disease upstaging (<i>P</i> = .007). For predicting disease upstaging, the top three radiomic principal components combined with clinical and qualitative MRI predictors yielded the highest AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.88) among all tested models (<i>P</i> = .007), identifying 25% more true-negative (49 of 93 true-negative findings, 53% specificity) findings, compared with using clinical information alone (23 of 93 true-negative findings, 28% specificity). Radiomic models were not predictive of the DCIS score (<i>P</i> > .05). Conclusion In patients with DCIS, combining radiomic metrics with clinical information improved prediction of disease upstaging but not DCIS score. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02352883 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> ©RSNA, 2025 See also the editorial by Kim and Woo in this issue.

RadiologyVol. 315(1)
Northwestern University (US), Tulane University (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Washington (US), Brown University (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US), Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center (US), Mass General Brigham (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
National Institutes of Health, Natural Reserve System, University of California
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.