High-Volume Fat Grafting With and Without Goldilocks Mastectomies Show Successful Clinical Outcomes for Breast Reconstruction

High-volume fat grafting is an autologous reconstructive technique that provides women with a minimally invasive surgical option, yet there remains a paucity of literature examining details about the reconstructive timeline and outcomes of this procedure. This study presents a retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience performing total autologous breast reconstruction using fat grafting alone or in combination with Goldilocks mastectomies. Our population included 39 breast reconstructions in 25 patients. Nineteen patients (28 breasts) had fat grafting only and 6 patients (11 breasts) had Goldilocks and fat grafting. On comparison, the fat grafting only group averaged 4 grafting sessions while the Goldilocks combined group averaged 2.64 sessions (P = 0.03). In the fat grafting only group, the total average volume of fat injected into each breast was 664 mL, and it was not significantly different from the Goldilocks combined group with 495 mL of fat (P = 0.111). In the fat grafting only group, there was a similar amount of fat injected in the first 5 grafting sessions; following the 5th session, there was a significant drop in volume grafted (P < 0.001). Four fat grafting-related complications were reported (10%) and 3 patients developed seromas following their Goldilocks mastectomies (27%). There were no tumor recurrences. We can conclude from this data that high-volume fat grafting is a successful and safe form of breast reconstruction. We show good volume achieved with minimal procedures necessary, especially when combined with Goldilocks mastectomies. This study depicts a reliable timeline for this autologous and safe reconstructive option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000004212
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Volume Fat Grafting With and Without Goldilocks Mastectomies Show Successful Clinical Outcomes for Breast Reconstruction

Pooja Humar, Michael Marallo, Meeti Mehta, Carolyn De La Cruz et al.
1 citations
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
article

High-Volume Fat Grafting With and Without Goldilocks Mastectomies Show Successful Clinical Outcomes for Breast Reconstruction

Pooja Humar, Michael Marallo, Meeti Mehta, Carolyn De La Cruz, Eva Roy, Shayan M. Sarrami
article en
1 citations

Abstract

High-volume fat grafting is an autologous reconstructive technique that provides women with a minimally invasive surgical option, yet there remains a paucity of literature examining details about the reconstructive timeline and outcomes of this procedure. This study presents a retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience performing total autologous breast reconstruction using fat grafting alone or in combination with Goldilocks mastectomies. Our population included 39 breast reconstructions in 25 patients. Nineteen patients (28 breasts) had fat grafting only and 6 patients (11 breasts) had Goldilocks and fat grafting. On comparison, the fat grafting only group averaged 4 grafting sessions while the Goldilocks combined group averaged 2.64 sessions (P = 0.03). In the fat grafting only group, the total average volume of fat injected into each breast was 664 mL, and it was not significantly different from the Goldilocks combined group with 495 mL of fat (P = 0.111). In the fat grafting only group, there was a similar amount of fat injected in the first 5 grafting sessions; following the 5th session, there was a significant drop in volume grafted (P < 0.001). Four fat grafting-related complications were reported (10%) and 3 patients developed seromas following their Goldilocks mastectomies (27%). There were no tumor recurrences. We can conclude from this data that high-volume fat grafting is a successful and safe form of breast reconstruction. We show good volume achieved with minimal procedures necessary, especially when combined with Goldilocks mastectomies. This study depicts a reliable timeline for this autologous and safe reconstructive option.

Annals of Plastic SurgeryVol. 94(4S)
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.