Turning the arrow: education after the age of the world-view

In this essay, I aim to make clear that modern education does not stand on neutral or natural ground but actually is more intimately connected to the “logic” of what Martin Heidegger has referred to as the “age of the world view” than what is often assumed. My focus will be on the philosophical analysis of this issue, situating the discussion firmly within Continental philosophy in conversation with Continental educational theory. The work presented in this essay is “groundwork” aimed at providing an opening towards education after the age of the world view. If in the age of the world view education is perceived in terms of learners who stand in a learning relationship with the world around them so that they are positioned as individuals who view the world and have a view on and about the world, education after the age of the world view turns the relationship in the other direction so that self and world appear altogether differently. I show how this allows for a return of both world and self and for an education in which learning no longer plays a central role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Education
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2025.2477587
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Educational Challenges and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turning the arrow: education after the age of the world-view

Gert Biesta
4 citations
Asia Pacific Journal of Education
Educational Challenges and Innovations
12.98
article

Turning the arrow: education after the age of the world-view

Gert Biesta
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this essay, I aim to make clear that modern education does not stand on neutral or natural ground but actually is more intimately connected to the “logic” of what Martin Heidegger has referred to as the “age of the world view” than what is often assumed. My focus will be on the philosophical analysis of this issue, situating the discussion firmly within Continental philosophy in conversation with Continental educational theory. The work presented in this essay is “groundwork” aimed at providing an opening towards education after the age of the world view. If in the age of the world view education is perceived in terms of learners who stand in a learning relationship with the world around them so that they are positioned as individuals who view the world and have a view on and about the world, education after the age of the world view turns the relationship in the other direction so that self and world appear altogether differently. I show how this allows for a return of both world and self and for an education in which learning no longer plays a central role.

Asia Pacific Journal of EducationVol. 46(2)
National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Challenges and Innovations
12.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.