A Comparative Analysis of IMUs and Optical Systems in Layup Shot Biomechanics

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) system against an optical motion capture system in detecting motion in the dynamically complex and constraint-governed task of the basketball layup shot. Ten basketball players performed 10 trials with and 10 without a defender. Key kinematic variables (jump height, take-off angle, joint angles, and centre of mass (COM) displacement) were derived, and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots) and disagreement (root mean square difference (RMSD) and statistical parametric mapping (SPM)) calculations were carried out for each trial. The IMU system provided agreeable results for jump height and take-off angle, while joint angles and COM displacement agreement were plane-specific. A between-condition analysis demonstrated the IMU system reliably detected joint angle differences between defended and undefended conditions comparable to the optical system for nine out of twelve joint angles, with shoulder flexion-extension and external-internal and elbow external-internal joint angles showing inconclusive results. Ultimately, the IMU system was generally able to detect similar magnitudes of difference between conditions to those detected by the optical motion-based system. Therefore, conclusions can be drawn for between-condition comparisons if data are derived from either system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073847
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of IMUs and Optical Systems in Layup Shot Biomechanics

Matthew T.G. Pain, Michael J. Hiley, Nuha Alkhalaf
3 citations
Applied Sciences
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
6.02
article

A Comparative Analysis of IMUs and Optical Systems in Layup Shot Biomechanics

Matthew T.G. Pain, Michael J. Hiley, Nuha Alkhalaf
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) system against an optical motion capture system in detecting motion in the dynamically complex and constraint-governed task of the basketball layup shot. Ten basketball players performed 10 trials with and 10 without a defender. Key kinematic variables (jump height, take-off angle, joint angles, and centre of mass (COM) displacement) were derived, and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots) and disagreement (root mean square difference (RMSD) and statistical parametric mapping (SPM)) calculations were carried out for each trial. The IMU system provided agreeable results for jump height and take-off angle, while joint angles and COM displacement agreement were plane-specific. A between-condition analysis demonstrated the IMU system reliably detected joint angle differences between defended and undefended conditions comparable to the optical system for nine out of twelve joint angles, with shoulder flexion-extension and external-internal and elbow external-internal joint angles showing inconclusive results. Ultimately, the IMU system was generally able to detect similar magnitudes of difference between conditions to those detected by the optical motion-based system. Therefore, conclusions can be drawn for between-condition comparisons if data are derived from either system.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(7)
Loughborough University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.