Demographic Differences in Social Adaptability of Individuals with Blindness in Harare Metropolitan, Zimbabwe

This study aimed to assess the social adaptability of individuals with blindness in Harare Metropolitan Province, Zimbabwe, using a quantitative approach. A total of 384 participants were selected through multistage sampling, with the sample size determined by Yamane’s formula. The study utilized a socio-demographic questionnaire and the Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale (SASS) to gather quantitative data. Data analysis was conducted using both descriptive and inferential statistics. The t-test results showed a statistically significant difference in social adaptability between women and men, with women exhibiting better social adaptability (t = 2.35, p < 0.05). The ANOVA test indicated a significant difference in social adaptability based on age (F = 5.43, p < 0.01). ANOVA results showed a significant relationship between education level and social adaptability (F = 6.78, p < 0.001). The ANOVA test also revealed a significant difference in social adaptability based on religious background (F = 4.56, p < 0.05). Christians and individuals from other religious groups displayed better social adaptability than Muslims and Hindus. The ANOVA results indicated a small difference in social adaptability between those with congenital blindness and those who acquired blindness later in life. This difference was not statistically significant (F = 1.21, p > 0.05). This study demonstrates that gender, age, education, and religious background are significant factors influencing the social adaptability of individuals with blindness in Harare Metropolitan Province, Zimbabwe.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.917psy0017
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demographic Differences in Social Adaptability of Individuals with Blindness in Harare Metropolitan, Zimbabwe

Henry Wasosa
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

Demographic Differences in Social Adaptability of Individuals with Blindness in Harare Metropolitan, Zimbabwe

Henry Wasosa
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the social adaptability of individuals with blindness in Harare Metropolitan Province, Zimbabwe, using a quantitative approach. A total of 384 participants were selected through multistage sampling, with the sample size determined by Yamane’s formula. The study utilized a socio-demographic questionnaire and the Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale (SASS) to gather quantitative data. Data analysis was conducted using both descriptive and inferential statistics. The t-test results showed a statistically significant difference in social adaptability between women and men, with women exhibiting better social adaptability (t = 2.35, p < 0.05). The ANOVA test indicated a significant difference in social adaptability based on age (F = 5.43, p < 0.01). ANOVA results showed a significant relationship between education level and social adaptability (F = 6.78, p < 0.001). The ANOVA test also revealed a significant difference in social adaptability based on religious background (F = 4.56, p < 0.05). Christians and individuals from other religious groups displayed better social adaptability than Muslims and Hindus. The ANOVA results indicated a small difference in social adaptability between those with congenital blindness and those who acquired blindness later in life. This difference was not statistically significant (F = 1.21, p > 0.05). This study demonstrates that gender, age, education, and religious background are significant factors influencing the social adaptability of individuals with blindness in Harare Metropolitan Province, Zimbabwe.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social ScienceVol. IX(XVII)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.