Simulative Comparison of DVB-S2X/RCS2 and 3GPP 5G NR NTN Technologies in a Geostationary Satellite Scenario

Comparison between existing, well-established satellite technologies, like the Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) satellite specifications, and the emerging Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) specified 5<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> Generation New Radio (5G NR) Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) is an actively discussed topic in the satellite industry standardization groups. This article presents a thorough performance comparison between DVB Second Generation Satellite Extensions (DVB-S2X) and Return Channel via Satellite 2<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">nd</sup> Generation (DVB-RCS2), and NR NTN in a Geostationary Orbit (GEO) satellite scenario, using system-level simulators (SLS) for evaluation, namely Satellite Network Simulator 3 (SNS3) and ALIX 5G (TN-)NTN SLS, built on the same Network Simulator 3 (ns-3) platform. With the satellite system geometry, beam layout, and link budget aligned to use the 3GPP NTN example parameterization for a fair comparison between DVB and NR NTN, the results show that DVB-S2X consistently achieves higher spectral efficiency than the NR Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) on the forward user link. In contrast, on the return link, the NR Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) demonstrates better spectral efficiency at the system level. The SLS results incorporate link-level performance, obtained through link-level simulations (LLS) for different modulation and coding schemes (MCS) and waveforms supported by each technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/asms/spsc64465.2025.10946040
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Satellite Communication Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulative Comparison of DVB-S2X/RCS2 and 3GPP 5G NR NTN Technologies in a Geostationary Satellite Scenario

Mikko Majamaa, Jani Puttonen, Sami Rantanen, Lauri Sormunen et al.
3 citations
Satellite Communication Systems
14.98
article

Simulative Comparison of DVB-S2X/RCS2 and 3GPP 5G NR NTN Technologies in a Geostationary Satellite Scenario

Mikko Majamaa, Jani Puttonen, Sami Rantanen, Lauri Sormunen, Frans Laakso, Verneri Rönty, Tuomas Huikko, Erno Seppänen, Vesa Hytönen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Comparison between existing, well-established satellite technologies, like the Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) satellite specifications, and the emerging Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) specified 5<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> Generation New Radio (5G NR) Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) is an actively discussed topic in the satellite industry standardization groups. This article presents a thorough performance comparison between DVB Second Generation Satellite Extensions (DVB-S2X) and Return Channel via Satellite 2<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">nd</sup> Generation (DVB-RCS2), and NR NTN in a Geostationary Orbit (GEO) satellite scenario, using system-level simulators (SLS) for evaluation, namely Satellite Network Simulator 3 (SNS3) and ALIX 5G (TN-)NTN SLS, built on the same Network Simulator 3 (ns-3) platform. With the satellite system geometry, beam layout, and link budget aligned to use the 3GPP NTN example parameterization for a fair comparison between DVB and NR NTN, the results show that DVB-S2X consistently achieves higher spectral efficiency than the NR Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) on the forward user link. In contrast, on the return link, the NR Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) demonstrates better spectral efficiency at the system level. The SLS results incorporate link-level performance, obtained through link-level simulations (LLS) for different modulation and coding schemes (MCS) and waveforms supported by each technology.

Magister Solutions (Finland) (FI)
European Space Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Satellite Communication Systems
14.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.