Fusion versus Non-fusion Surgery for Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis: Preferences of Patients, Caregivers, and Patient-Caregiver Dyads

Study DesignOriginal research, cross-sectional study.ObjectivesEvaluate preferences of patients, caregivers, and patient-caregiver dyads for non-fusion vs fusion surgery.MethodsA survey-based discrete choice experiment included patients 12-15 years of age with idiopathic scoliosis and their caregivers. Preference weights were estimated for 2 types of attributes that differed between fusion and non-fusion surgery: treatment outcomes (ie, appearance, confidence in planned correction, spinal motion, device failure, reoperation, and recovery period) and procedure-type requirements associated with each surgery type. Correlations between preference weights for patients, caregivers, and dyads were calculated to assess preference concordance between cohorts.ResultsA total of 344 respondents (124 patients, 92 caregivers, and 128 patient/caregiver dyads) completed the survey. Appearance was the most important treatment outcome for the average respondent in all cohorts. For patients, the least important treatment outcome was recovery time, whereas reoperation rate was the least important treatment outcome for caregivers and dyads. After controlling for treatment outcomes, patients and patient-caregiver dyads preferred the procedure-type requirements associated with fusion surgery, while caregivers preferred the procedure-type requirements associated with non-fusion surgery. Preferences of respondents who completed the survey prior to surgery were similar to those who completed the survey after surgery. Patient and caregiver preferences were more similar to the preferences of dyads than to each other.ConclusionsPatients and patient-caregiver dyads preferred the procedure-type requirements associated with fusion surgery, while caregivers preferred the procedure-type requirements associated with non-fusion surgery. Appearance was the most important treatment outcome for patients, caregivers, and patient-caregiver dyads.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251330217
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fusion versus Non-fusion Surgery for Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis: Preferences of Patients, Caregivers, and Patient-Caregiver Dyads

Raquel Peat, Patrick J. Cahill, Peter O. Newton, Michelle E. Tarver et al.
Global Spine Journal
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Fusion versus Non-fusion Surgery for Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis: Preferences of Patients, Caregivers, and Patient-Caregiver Dyads

Raquel Peat, Patrick J. Cahill, Peter O. Newton, Michelle E. Tarver, Olufemi Babalola, A. Noelle Larson, Amer F. Samdani, Michelle C. Marks, Suken A. Shah, Keith Bachmann, Juan Marcos González, Vincent J. Devlin, David Gebben, BARON S. LONNER
article en

Abstract

Study DesignOriginal research, cross-sectional study.ObjectivesEvaluate preferences of patients, caregivers, and patient-caregiver dyads for non-fusion vs fusion surgery.MethodsA survey-based discrete choice experiment included patients 12-15 years of age with idiopathic scoliosis and their caregivers. Preference weights were estimated for 2 types of attributes that differed between fusion and non-fusion surgery: treatment outcomes (ie, appearance, confidence in planned correction, spinal motion, device failure, reoperation, and recovery period) and procedure-type requirements associated with each surgery type. Correlations between preference weights for patients, caregivers, and dyads were calculated to assess preference concordance between cohorts.ResultsA total of 344 respondents (124 patients, 92 caregivers, and 128 patient/caregiver dyads) completed the survey. Appearance was the most important treatment outcome for the average respondent in all cohorts. For patients, the least important treatment outcome was recovery time, whereas reoperation rate was the least important treatment outcome for caregivers and dyads. After controlling for treatment outcomes, patients and patient-caregiver dyads preferred the procedure-type requirements associated with fusion surgery, while caregivers preferred the procedure-type requirements associated with non-fusion surgery. Preferences of respondents who completed the survey prior to surgery were similar to those who completed the survey after surgery. Patient and caregiver preferences were more similar to the preferences of dyads than to each other.ConclusionsPatients and patient-caregiver dyads preferred the procedure-type requirements associated with fusion surgery, while caregivers preferred the procedure-type requirements associated with non-fusion surgery. Appearance was the most important treatment outcome for patients, caregivers, and patient-caregiver dyads.

Global Spine JournalVol. 15(8)
United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (US), Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Shriners Hospitals for Children - Philadelphia (US), Food and Drug Administration (TH), Children's Hospital (TN), University of Virginia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.