When Should Surgical Human Subject Research Involve Patients Who Are Incarcerated?

Surgical research involving patients who are incarcerated is fraught with ethical, logistical, and practical questions. This article first considers important moments in the history of research with people who are incarcerated and suggests how they have contributed to evolution in human subject research ethics and regulation. This article also examines the problem of limited data about surgical disease burden and describes barriers to enrolling individuals who are incarcerated in surgical clinical trials, including study exclusion criteria and clinician-investigator bias. Finally, this article recommends strategies for balancing human research subject protections with the need for equitable enrollment in surgical clinical trials, especially later-phase trials in which benefit is more likely than in early-phase trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The AMA Journal of Ethic
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.283
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Should Surgical Human Subject Research Involve Patients Who Are Incarcerated?

Lubna Khan, Marcus Hoffman
The AMA Journal of Ethic
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

When Should Surgical Human Subject Research Involve Patients Who Are Incarcerated?

Lubna Khan, Marcus Hoffman
article en

Abstract

Surgical research involving patients who are incarcerated is fraught with ethical, logistical, and practical questions. This article first considers important moments in the history of research with people who are incarcerated and suggests how they have contributed to evolution in human subject research ethics and regulation. This article also examines the problem of limited data about surgical disease burden and describes barriers to enrolling individuals who are incarcerated in surgical clinical trials, including study exclusion criteria and clinician-investigator bias. Finally, this article recommends strategies for balancing human research subject protections with the need for equitable enrollment in surgical clinical trials, especially later-phase trials in which benefit is more likely than in early-phase trials.

The AMA Journal of EthicVol. 27(4)
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Should Surgical Human Subject Research Involve Patients Who Are Incarcerated? — Lubna Khan, Marcus Hoffman · The AMA Journal of Ethic (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS