Research note: double digest restriction site associated DNA sequencing is a suitable alternative to high density SNP chips for genomic selection of layers

For the genomic selection of laying hens, the costs of genotyping are still a challenge. Alternative genotyping approaches as low density SNP chips have been developed by breeding companies to avoid the use of the high-density SNP chip (HD). Another approach called double digest restriction site associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-seq), associated with an appropriate quality control was also proven to be reliable to genotype laying hens. From this perspective, the use of ddRAD-seq genotypes as an alternative to HD SNP chip genotypes was studied for the genomic evaluation of 179 candidate individuals in a commercial pure line of laying hens of Rhode Island. Genomic evaluations based on ancestry were performed in three different scenari and for four egg quality traits. The first scenario is the reference scenario using only HD SNP chip genotypes. The genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were calculated for the 179 candidates with 437 individuals as the reference population (GEBV<sub>HDchip437</sub>). In the second scenario, the reference population included only the 50 individuals with true ddRAD-seq genotypes and GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq50</sub> were calculated for the 179 candidates, based on their ddRAD-seq genotypes. Finally, for the third scenario of genomic evaluation, the reference population was constituted of 437 individuals, with simulated ddRAD-seq genotypes. The GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq437</sub> were calculated for the 179 candidates based on their true ddRAD-seq genotypes. Then, Spearman correlations were calculated between GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq50</sub> or GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq437</sub> and the reference GEBV<sub>HDchip437</sub>. The mean rank correlation between GEBV<sub>HDchip437</sub> and GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq50</sub> was 0.92. The mean correlation between GEBV<sub>HDchip437</sub> and GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq437</sub> was 0.98. The reduced reference population of the GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq50</sub> scenario didn't permit for a good representation of the genetic diversity in the population. But, with an equivalent reference population, genomic evaluation based on ddRAD-seq genotypes achieves similar results as genomic evaluation based on HD SNP chip genotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105115
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research note: double digest restriction site associated DNA sequencing is a suitable alternative to high density SNP chips for genomic selection of layers

Lorry Bécot, Sophie Allais, Frédéric Lecerf, Mathilde Doublet
1 citations
Poultry Science
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
1.82
article

Research note: double digest restriction site associated DNA sequencing is a suitable alternative to high density SNP chips for genomic selection of layers

Lorry Bécot, Sophie Allais, Frédéric Lecerf, Mathilde Doublet
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For the genomic selection of laying hens, the costs of genotyping are still a challenge. Alternative genotyping approaches as low density SNP chips have been developed by breeding companies to avoid the use of the high-density SNP chip (HD). Another approach called double digest restriction site associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-seq), associated with an appropriate quality control was also proven to be reliable to genotype laying hens. From this perspective, the use of ddRAD-seq genotypes as an alternative to HD SNP chip genotypes was studied for the genomic evaluation of 179 candidate individuals in a commercial pure line of laying hens of Rhode Island. Genomic evaluations based on ancestry were performed in three different scenari and for four egg quality traits. The first scenario is the reference scenario using only HD SNP chip genotypes. The genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were calculated for the 179 candidates with 437 individuals as the reference population (GEBV<sub>HDchip437</sub>). In the second scenario, the reference population included only the 50 individuals with true ddRAD-seq genotypes and GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq50</sub> were calculated for the 179 candidates, based on their ddRAD-seq genotypes. Finally, for the third scenario of genomic evaluation, the reference population was constituted of 437 individuals, with simulated ddRAD-seq genotypes. The GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq437</sub> were calculated for the 179 candidates based on their true ddRAD-seq genotypes. Then, Spearman correlations were calculated between GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq50</sub> or GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq437</sub> and the reference GEBV<sub>HDchip437</sub>. The mean rank correlation between GEBV<sub>HDchip437</sub> and GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq50</sub> was 0.92. The mean correlation between GEBV<sub>HDchip437</sub> and GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq437</sub> was 0.98. The reduced reference population of the GEBV<sub>ddRAD-seq50</sub> scenario didn't permit for a good representation of the genetic diversity in the population. But, with an equivalent reference population, genomic evaluation based on ddRAD-seq genotypes achieves similar results as genomic evaluation based on HD SNP chip genotypes.

Poultry ScienceVol. 104(7)
Altran (France) (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.