Investigating socioscientific decision-making of high school biology students based on gender and area coverage

Introduction: Socioscientific decision-making involves the process of analysing complex problems, seeking relevant information, building arguments, applying critical thinking skills, and integrating diverse perspectives to arrive at a Solution. This study aims to explore the extent to which gender and geographical location affect students' socioscientific reasoning.Research method: it uses a quantitative research approach with a quantitative ex-post facto design. The research population consisted of all tenth-grade students in West Kalimantan Province. The sample for the study consisted of 912 students selected from public and private high schools. in Pontianak Municipality, Teluk Keramat District, and Paloh District, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. Participants were recruited using purposive random sampling. Students are then categorized based on gender and regional coverage. Gender criteria are visualized in men and women, while the criteria for regional coverage are urban (Municipal) and rural (District).The results of the study showed that male students significantly outperformed female students in socioscientific decision-making. This difference is evident in the quality of the arguments and explanations provided by male students in their essay responses, demonstrating a deeper understanding of the issue. Conclusion: that there is a gap in socioscientific decision-making ability between students in urban and rural areas. The study revealed that urban students tend to have stronger socioscientific decision-making skills compared to rural students

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Salud Ciencia y Tecnología
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251522
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating socioscientific decision-making of high school biology students based on gender and area coverage

Herawati Susilo, Sueb Sueb, Susriyati Mahanal, Handy Darmawan
Salud Ciencia y Tecnología
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Investigating socioscientific decision-making of high school biology students based on gender and area coverage

Herawati Susilo, Sueb Sueb, Susriyati Mahanal, Handy Darmawan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Socioscientific decision-making involves the process of analysing complex problems, seeking relevant information, building arguments, applying critical thinking skills, and integrating diverse perspectives to arrive at a Solution. This study aims to explore the extent to which gender and geographical location affect students' socioscientific reasoning.Research method: it uses a quantitative research approach with a quantitative ex-post facto design. The research population consisted of all tenth-grade students in West Kalimantan Province. The sample for the study consisted of 912 students selected from public and private high schools. in Pontianak Municipality, Teluk Keramat District, and Paloh District, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. Participants were recruited using purposive random sampling. Students are then categorized based on gender and regional coverage. Gender criteria are visualized in men and women, while the criteria for regional coverage are urban (Municipal) and rural (District).The results of the study showed that male students significantly outperformed female students in socioscientific decision-making. This difference is evident in the quality of the arguments and explanations provided by male students in their essay responses, demonstrating a deeper understanding of the issue. Conclusion: that there is a gap in socioscientific decision-making ability between students in urban and rural areas. The study revealed that urban students tend to have stronger socioscientific decision-making skills compared to rural students

Salud Ciencia y TecnologíaVol. 5
State University of Malang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating socioscientific decision-making of high school biology students based on gender and area coverage — Herawati Susilo, Sueb Sueb, et al. · Salud Ciencia y Tecnología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS