Metal–oxygen bonding characteristics dictate activity and stability differences of RuO <sub>2</sub> and IrO <sub>2</sub> in the acidic oxygen evolution reaction

Ruthenium dioxide (RuO<sub>2</sub>) and iridium dioxide (IrO<sub>2</sub>) serve as benchmark electrocatalysts for the acidic oxygen evolution reaction (OER), yet their intrinsic activity-stability relationships remain elusive. Herein, we employ density functional theory (DFT) calculations to systematically investigate the origin of divergent OER catalytic behaviors between RuO<sub>2</sub> and IrO<sub>2</sub> in acidic media. Mechanistic analyses reveal that RuO<sub>2</sub> follows the adsorbate evolution mechanism with superior activity (theoretical overpotential: 0.698 V <i>vs.</i> 0.909 V for IrO<sub>2</sub>), while IrO<sub>2</sub> demonstrates enhanced stability due to a higher dissolution energy change (>2.9 eV <i>vs.</i> -0.306 eV for RuO<sub>2</sub>). Electronic structure analysis reveals that RuO<sub>2</sub> exhibits ionic-dominated metal-oxygen bonds with delocalized electron distribution, facilitating intermediate desorption but promoting detrimental RuO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> dissolution. In contrast, IrO<sub>2</sub> features covalent bonding characteristics with more electron filling in Ir-oxygen bonds (2.942 <i>vs.</i> 2.412 for RuO<sub>2</sub>), thereby stabilizing surface intermediates against dissolution at the expense of higher OER barriers. This work establishes a clear correlation between the bonding nature and electrocatalytic performance metrics, offering fundamental insights for the rational design of acid-stable OER electrocatalysts with optimized activity-stability relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5cp00666j
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metal–oxygen bonding characteristics dictate activity and stability differences of RuO 2 and IrO 2 in the acidic oxygen evolution reaction

Zidong Wei, Li Li, Xia Chen, Qiong Xiang et al.
13 citations
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
6.73
article

Metal–oxygen bonding characteristics dictate activity and stability differences of RuO 2 and IrO 2 in the acidic oxygen evolution reaction

Zidong Wei, Li Li, Xia Chen, Qiong Xiang, Zhuoyang Xie, Longdan Tang, Jin Liu
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Ruthenium dioxide (RuO<sub>2</sub>) and iridium dioxide (IrO<sub>2</sub>) serve as benchmark electrocatalysts for the acidic oxygen evolution reaction (OER), yet their intrinsic activity-stability relationships remain elusive. Herein, we employ density functional theory (DFT) calculations to systematically investigate the origin of divergent OER catalytic behaviors between RuO<sub>2</sub> and IrO<sub>2</sub> in acidic media. Mechanistic analyses reveal that RuO<sub>2</sub> follows the adsorbate evolution mechanism with superior activity (theoretical overpotential: 0.698 V <i>vs.</i> 0.909 V for IrO<sub>2</sub>), while IrO<sub>2</sub> demonstrates enhanced stability due to a higher dissolution energy change (>2.9 eV <i>vs.</i> -0.306 eV for RuO<sub>2</sub>). Electronic structure analysis reveals that RuO<sub>2</sub> exhibits ionic-dominated metal-oxygen bonds with delocalized electron distribution, facilitating intermediate desorption but promoting detrimental RuO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> dissolution. In contrast, IrO<sub>2</sub> features covalent bonding characteristics with more electron filling in Ir-oxygen bonds (2.942 <i>vs.</i> 2.412 for RuO<sub>2</sub>), thereby stabilizing surface intermediates against dissolution at the expense of higher OER barriers. This work establishes a clear correlation between the bonding nature and electrocatalytic performance metrics, offering fundamental insights for the rational design of acid-stable OER electrocatalysts with optimized activity-stability relationships.

Physical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsVol. 27(18)
Chongqing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
6.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.