Exploring teachers’ corrective feedback strategies in English for specific purposes (ESP) descriptive text writing

The growing demand for vocational education in Indonesia is driven by an increasingly competitive job market, requiring students to develop specialized skills, including proficiency in English for Specific Purposes (ESP). English teachers play a crucial role in enhancing students’ writing abilities, particularly in crafting descriptive texts relevant to their fields of study. However, limited research has explored how teachers provide corrective feedback in ESP writing instruction. This study investigates the corrective feedback strategies employed by an English teacher in a vocational school when teaching descriptive text writing. It also examines the rationale behind the teacher’s feedback practices. A qualitative case study approach was used, with data collected through interviews, classroom observations, and an analysis of students' written assignments. The findings indicate that the teacher primarily utilized oral corrective feedback during writing instruction, focusing on product description texts. The feedback strategies included explicit correction, metalinguistic feedback, and recasts. Explicit correction involved directly pointing out errors and providing correct alternatives, while metalinguistic feedback prompted students to self-correct by offering linguistic explanations. Recasts, on the other hand, involved reformulating students' erroneous statements in a more accurate form. The study further revealed that the teacher’s feedback approach was influenced by personal teaching experience and beliefs about effective language instruction. These findings highlight the importance of oral corrective feedback in improving students’ writing skills in ESP contexts. They suggest that teachers should adopt varied feedback strategies tailored to students’ needs to enhance learning outcomes. Future research could explore the long-term effects of different corrective feedback methods on students' writing development in vocational education settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies.
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v4i1.48
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring teachers’ corrective feedback strategies in English for specific purposes (ESP) descriptive text writing

Affied Alfayed, Sri Nur Hartiningsih, Mohammad Hamdani
Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies.
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Exploring teachers’ corrective feedback strategies in English for specific purposes (ESP) descriptive text writing

Affied Alfayed, Sri Nur Hartiningsih, Mohammad Hamdani
article en

Abstract

The growing demand for vocational education in Indonesia is driven by an increasingly competitive job market, requiring students to develop specialized skills, including proficiency in English for Specific Purposes (ESP). English teachers play a crucial role in enhancing students’ writing abilities, particularly in crafting descriptive texts relevant to their fields of study. However, limited research has explored how teachers provide corrective feedback in ESP writing instruction. This study investigates the corrective feedback strategies employed by an English teacher in a vocational school when teaching descriptive text writing. It also examines the rationale behind the teacher’s feedback practices. A qualitative case study approach was used, with data collected through interviews, classroom observations, and an analysis of students' written assignments. The findings indicate that the teacher primarily utilized oral corrective feedback during writing instruction, focusing on product description texts. The feedback strategies included explicit correction, metalinguistic feedback, and recasts. Explicit correction involved directly pointing out errors and providing correct alternatives, while metalinguistic feedback prompted students to self-correct by offering linguistic explanations. Recasts, on the other hand, involved reformulating students' erroneous statements in a more accurate form. The study further revealed that the teacher’s feedback approach was influenced by personal teaching experience and beliefs about effective language instruction. These findings highlight the importance of oral corrective feedback in improving students’ writing skills in ESP contexts. They suggest that teachers should adopt varied feedback strategies tailored to students’ needs to enhance learning outcomes. Future research could explore the long-term effects of different corrective feedback methods on students' writing development in vocational education settings.

Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies.Vol. 4(1)
Singapore Maritime Institute (SG), Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.