Effective codescent morphisms of ternary rings

Effective codescent morphisms of ternary rings are characterized. To this end, it is shown that, the variety of ternary rings satisfies the strong amalgamation property, and, moreover, in this variety, the elements of amalgamated free products have unique normal forms. In view of the fact that the category of ternary rings contains the category of commutative associative unitary rings as a full subcategory, the class of effective codescent morphisms in the latter category (which, according to the well-known Joyal-Tierney's criterion, are precisely monomorphisms $R\rightarrowtail S$ which are pure as monomorphisms of $R$-modules) is compared with that of morphisms between commutative associative unitary rings which are effective codescent in the category of ternary rings. It turns out that the former class is contained in the latter one, but does not coincide with it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Studies Euro-Tbilisi Mathematical Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32513/asetmj/1932200825018
Primary Topic
Rings, Modules, and Algebras
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective codescent morphisms of ternary rings

Guram Samsonadze, Dali Zangurashvili
Advanced Studies Euro-Tbilisi Mathematical Journal
Rings, Modules, and Algebras
article

Effective codescent morphisms of ternary rings

Guram Samsonadze, Dali Zangurashvili
article en

Abstract

Effective codescent morphisms of ternary rings are characterized. To this end, it is shown that, the variety of ternary rings satisfies the strong amalgamation property, and, moreover, in this variety, the elements of amalgamated free products have unique normal forms. In view of the fact that the category of ternary rings contains the category of commutative associative unitary rings as a full subcategory, the class of effective codescent morphisms in the latter category (which, according to the well-known Joyal-Tierney's criterion, are precisely monomorphisms $R\rightarrowtail S$ which are pure as monomorphisms of $R$-modules) is compared with that of morphisms between commutative associative unitary rings which are effective codescent in the category of ternary rings. It turns out that the former class is contained in the latter one, but does not coincide with it.

Advanced Studies Euro-Tbilisi Mathematical JournalVol. 18(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Rings, Modules, and Algebras
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.