Fear Factor: Faculty Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Physician Associate Education

This paper focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in physician assistant/associate (PA) education based upon results from a national survey of PA faculty conducted by the PA Education Association in early 2024. This is the first survey of its kind to assess PA faculty perspectives on the topic. It adds to the growing body of knowledge related to AI across all contemporary business, social, and educational activities. A survey containing Likert ranking questions and open-ended comments was sent to all faculty listed in the PA Education Association database (n = 4338). A response rate of 14.8% was established after removing incomplete survey responses from the data set. The knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among faculty were analyzed, along with open-ended comments that explored concerns and current utilization of digital technology among participating respondents. While knowledge of AI technology was measured as average to good by 60.9% of faculty, confidence in using it was low. Group differences in self-reported knowledge of AI was only significant by participants' primary role in in their institution (χ 2 (10) = 53.6, P ≤ 0.001). Participation in formal or informal continuing education programs focused on AI appears to increase confidence levels among participants, although only 35% of respondents indicated participating in these activities. Most respondents (64.9%) expressed a positive view of AI technology in PA education, but did express concerns, particularly on student's development of critical thinking skills and academic integrity. The paper concludes by recommending training and support for faculty to harness AI's potential and enhance PA education, ensuring that AI complements rather than replaces the critical human elements in teaching and learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physician Assistant Education
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jpa.0000000000000667
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fear Factor: Faculty Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Physician Associate Education

D. Simeon, Howard Straker, Kara Caruthers, Michel Statler et al.
6 citations
The Journal of Physician Assistant Education
Innovations in Medical Education
11.27
article

Fear Factor: Faculty Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Physician Associate Education

D. Simeon, Howard Straker, Kara Caruthers, Michel Statler, Denise Rizzolo, Heitor Rosa, Lisa Alexander, Jonathan Bowser, Linda Sekhon
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This paper focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in physician assistant/associate (PA) education based upon results from a national survey of PA faculty conducted by the PA Education Association in early 2024. This is the first survey of its kind to assess PA faculty perspectives on the topic. It adds to the growing body of knowledge related to AI across all contemporary business, social, and educational activities. A survey containing Likert ranking questions and open-ended comments was sent to all faculty listed in the PA Education Association database (n = 4338). A response rate of 14.8% was established after removing incomplete survey responses from the data set. The knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among faculty were analyzed, along with open-ended comments that explored concerns and current utilization of digital technology among participating respondents. While knowledge of AI technology was measured as average to good by 60.9% of faculty, confidence in using it was low. Group differences in self-reported knowledge of AI was only significant by participants' primary role in in their institution (χ 2 (10) = 53.6, P ≤ 0.001). Participation in formal or informal continuing education programs focused on AI appears to increase confidence levels among participants, although only 35% of respondents indicated participating in these activities. Most respondents (64.9%) expressed a positive view of AI technology in PA education, but did express concerns, particularly on student's development of critical thinking skills and academic integrity. The paper concludes by recommending training and support for faculty to harness AI's potential and enhance PA education, ensuring that AI complements rather than replaces the critical human elements in teaching and learning.

The Journal of Physician Assistant EducationVol. 36(3)
High Point University (US), Meharry Medical College (US), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), George Washington University (US), Consumer Healthcare Products Association (US), University of the West Indies (TT), Physician Assistant Education Association (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovations in Medical Education
11.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.