Utilization of the Buccal Fat Pad Flap With Primary Cleft Palate Repair to Improve Speech Outcomes: An Evaluation of Financial Implications

Introduction: Primary cleft palate repair is associated with significant psychosocial burdens for patients and their families. The abundance of operations and appointments create financial and non-financial hardships for the patient and health care system alike. Therefore, the financial implications of cleft care have become an area of focus in craniofacial surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the financial implications of utilization of the buccal fat pad flap (BFPF) during primary cleft palate repair. We hypothesized that utilization of the BFPF as vascularized soft tissue filler would decrease the need for secondary speech operations, therefore decreasing the financial burden of cleft care on patients and the health care system. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed that included 146 patients who underwent primary cleft palate repair between 1996 and 2022. Medicare.gov national average costs were utilized to establish standardized direct secondary cleft palate procedural costs, and the total direct and indirect financial cost associated with secondary speech operations was also determined. Results: It was found that usage of the BFPF resulted in a reduction of roughly $1000 in direct secondary procedural costs and a reduction of roughly $3000 in total financial secondary procedural costs for patients. Furthermore, the BFPF’s role in reducing a patient’s need for a secondary speech procedure was reaffirmed with a 15% absolute risk reduction for BFPF patients. Discussion: Overall, cleft palate patients treated with BFPF at the time of initial surgery benefited due to the decreased likelihood of requiring a secondary speech operation as this resulted in a reduction in financial and non-financial costs associated with cleft palate repair, reducing financial toxicity as a whole.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FACE
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27325016251330799
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilization of the Buccal Fat Pad Flap With Primary Cleft Palate Repair to Improve Speech Outcomes: An Evaluation of Financial Implications

Nathan Sheppard, Jeremy V. Lynn, Steven R. Buchman, Steven J. Kasten et al.
FACE
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Utilization of the Buccal Fat Pad Flap With Primary Cleft Palate Repair to Improve Speech Outcomes: An Evaluation of Financial Implications

Nathan Sheppard, Jeremy V. Lynn, Steven R. Buchman, Steven J. Kasten, Christian J. Vercler, Noah S. Nelson, Melissa Daniel, Christian T. Stipho
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Primary cleft palate repair is associated with significant psychosocial burdens for patients and their families. The abundance of operations and appointments create financial and non-financial hardships for the patient and health care system alike. Therefore, the financial implications of cleft care have become an area of focus in craniofacial surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the financial implications of utilization of the buccal fat pad flap (BFPF) during primary cleft palate repair. We hypothesized that utilization of the BFPF as vascularized soft tissue filler would decrease the need for secondary speech operations, therefore decreasing the financial burden of cleft care on patients and the health care system. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed that included 146 patients who underwent primary cleft palate repair between 1996 and 2022. Medicare.gov national average costs were utilized to establish standardized direct secondary cleft palate procedural costs, and the total direct and indirect financial cost associated with secondary speech operations was also determined. Results: It was found that usage of the BFPF resulted in a reduction of roughly $1000 in direct secondary procedural costs and a reduction of roughly $3000 in total financial secondary procedural costs for patients. Furthermore, the BFPF’s role in reducing a patient’s need for a secondary speech procedure was reaffirmed with a 15% absolute risk reduction for BFPF patients. Discussion: Overall, cleft palate patients treated with BFPF at the time of initial surgery benefited due to the decreased likelihood of requiring a secondary speech operation as this resulted in a reduction in financial and non-financial costs associated with cleft palate repair, reducing financial toxicity as a whole.

FACEVol. 6(2)
University of Michigan (US), Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple (US), University of Oklahoma - Tulsa, University of Oklahoma (US), University of Tulsa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.