Optimization of Photovoltaic Power Forecasting: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Architectures, Optimization Techniques, and Evaluation Metrics

This study presents a systematic evaluation of deep learning architectures for photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting, comparing nine model configurations across three architectures (MLP, LSTM, CNN) and three optimizers (Adam, RMSprop, Adagrad). Using six years of hourly data from a 350kWp grid-connected PV system in Scotland, we demonstrate that architectural choice and optimizer selection significantly impact forecasting accuracy. The LSTM-RMSprop configuration achieved superior performance with RMSE of 2.651 kWh and MAE of 1.197 kWh, showing a 90.29% coefficient of determination (R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>). This outperforms both CNN (RMSE: 2.767-2.902 kWh) and MLP architectures (RMSE: 3.104-3.115 kWh) across all optimizers. Our main contributions include: (1) comprehensive optimization of model architectures through hyperparameter evaluation, revealing optimal configurations for each model type; (2) systematic evaluation of optimizer impact, demonstrating RMSprop's superiority for LSTM with improved accuracy across architectures; (3) detailed error analysis showing model stability across different conditions, with NRMSE ranging from 31.15% to 39.07%; and (4) practical insights into computational requirements, where CNN architectures achieve fastest training times (2.3-3.8 minutes/epoch) compared to LSTM (3.9-5.9 minutes/epoch) and MLP (36.54-46.72 minutes/epoch). Results demonstrate that LSTM architectures with appropriate optimization can outperform simpler models in PV power forecasting, providing valuable guidance for practical implementations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lt64002.2025.10941436
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of Photovoltaic Power Forecasting: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Architectures, Optimization Techniques, and Evaluation Metrics

Eulalia Jadraque Gago, Zain Balfagih, Mohammed Balfaqih, M.C. Pegalajar et al.
1 citations
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.73
article

Optimization of Photovoltaic Power Forecasting: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Architectures, Optimization Techniques, and Evaluation Metrics

Eulalia Jadraque Gago, Zain Balfagih, Mohammed Balfaqih, M.C. Pegalajar, Husein Mauladdawilah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents a systematic evaluation of deep learning architectures for photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting, comparing nine model configurations across three architectures (MLP, LSTM, CNN) and three optimizers (Adam, RMSprop, Adagrad). Using six years of hourly data from a 350kWp grid-connected PV system in Scotland, we demonstrate that architectural choice and optimizer selection significantly impact forecasting accuracy. The LSTM-RMSprop configuration achieved superior performance with RMSE of 2.651 kWh and MAE of 1.197 kWh, showing a 90.29% coefficient of determination (R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>). This outperforms both CNN (RMSE: 2.767-2.902 kWh) and MLP architectures (RMSE: 3.104-3.115 kWh) across all optimizers. Our main contributions include: (1) comprehensive optimization of model architectures through hyperparameter evaluation, revealing optimal configurations for each model type; (2) systematic evaluation of optimizer impact, demonstrating RMSprop's superiority for LSTM with improved accuracy across architectures; (3) detailed error analysis showing model stability across different conditions, with NRMSE ranging from 31.15% to 39.07%; and (4) practical insights into computational requirements, where CNN architectures achieve fastest training times (2.3-3.8 minutes/epoch) compared to LSTM (3.9-5.9 minutes/epoch) and MLP (36.54-46.72 minutes/epoch). Results demonstrate that LSTM architectures with appropriate optimization can outperform simpler models in PV power forecasting, providing valuable guidance for practical implementations.

Effat University (SA), Universidad de Granada (ES), University of Jeddah (SA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.