Factors associated with increased severity of generalized myasthenia gravis among patients in the United States and Europe

Among individuals with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), risk factors for increased severity over time are unknown. This study examined the association between demographic and clinical variables and patient progression to a more severe MG Foundation of America (MGFA) classification. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World myasthenia gravis Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey capturing retrospective data from patients' medical histories. Among 421 individuals, 16% experienced increased gMG severity (progression to higher MGFA class between diagnosis and the time of the survey, 1-7 years later) and for 84%, gMG was stable/improved (MGFA class the same/lower). Logistic elastic net regression determined that increased severity was associated with the occurrence of prior misdiagnosis. Bivariate analyses indicated significant associations between increased severity and longer time between symptom onset and (a) the first consultation with a healthcare practitioner and (b) MG diagnosis. Increased severity was also associated with older age and presence of specific symptoms at diagnosis. gMG stability/improvement was associated with employment status and general fatigue at diagnosis. There is a need for prompt and accurate diagnosis and improved treatment options with the potential to increase the likelihood of stability/improvement for gMG patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93464-w
Primary Topic
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors associated with increased severity of generalized myasthenia gravis among patients in the United States and Europe

Sophie Barlow, Gregor Gibson, Zia Choudhry, Emma Chatterton et al.
Scientific Reports
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
article

Factors associated with increased severity of generalized myasthenia gravis among patients in the United States and Europe

Sophie Barlow, Gregor Gibson, Zia Choudhry, Emma Chatterton, Jacqueline A. Pesa, Shiva Lauretta Birija, Raghav Govindarajan, Jonathan de Courcy, Bethan Hahn
article en

Abstract

Among individuals with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), risk factors for increased severity over time are unknown. This study examined the association between demographic and clinical variables and patient progression to a more severe MG Foundation of America (MGFA) classification. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World myasthenia gravis Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey capturing retrospective data from patients' medical histories. Among 421 individuals, 16% experienced increased gMG severity (progression to higher MGFA class between diagnosis and the time of the survey, 1-7 years later) and for 84%, gMG was stable/improved (MGFA class the same/lower). Logistic elastic net regression determined that increased severity was associated with the occurrence of prior misdiagnosis. Bivariate analyses indicated significant associations between increased severity and longer time between symptom onset and (a) the first consultation with a healthcare practitioner and (b) MG diagnosis. Increased severity was also associated with older age and presence of specific symptoms at diagnosis. gMG stability/improvement was associated with employment status and general fatigue at diagnosis. There is a need for prompt and accurate diagnosis and improved treatment options with the potential to increase the likelihood of stability/improvement for gMG patients.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Macclesfield College (GB), Adelphi Group (United Kingdom) (GB), Janssen (United States) (US), Janssen Scientific Affairs (United States)
Janssen Scientific Affairs
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.