Describing How Scenario Topic, Situation Urgency and Complexity Level Impacts Simulation Observers’ Clinical Judgment: A Secondary Analysis

Introduction Nurses use clinical judgment (CJ), or the process of “thinking like a nurse” by recognizing and interpreting a patient's concerns, to guide care decisions. However, nursing students graduate without sufficient CJ for safe nursing practice. A prior investigation found observing simulations leads to significant, but inconsistent CJ gains, depending on learner ability. Observers watched diverse simulation designs with increasing complexity, highlighting the need to understand which conditions best support CJ development. Objective This secondary analysis of a prior investigation aims to describe how simulation designs (i.e., scenario topic and situation urgency) and complexity level impacts CJ. A secondary aim is to investigate how simulation designs and complexity level impacts CJ based on learner ability. Methods Sixty-one junior-level baccalaureate students participated in the study over a semester. Participants observed eight expert-modeled simulations, each focused on medical-surgical or mental health scenarios in either urgent or routine situations. After each simulation, participants responded to 11 CJ prompts, which were scored using the Lasater CJ Rubric (LCJR). The scenarios were rated for complexity (simple, moderate, difficult, complex) based on author-identified sources. Participants were grouped into low-, medium-, or high-ability categories based on their cumulative LCJR scores. Two separate two-way repeated measures ANOVAs examined how simulation topics and situation urgency influenced CJ, with analyses repeated for each ability group. Results Observers’ mean CJ is influenced by both simulation design and complexity level. CJ decreases in complex medical-surgical and mental health scenarios as complexity exceeds a “difficult” rating, regardless of ability. However, CJ improves in simple and moderately complex routine situations. Observing “difficult” and “complex” simulations hindered significant CJ gains, regardless of ability. Conclusions Nurse educators should consider learner ability and complexity level when designing simulation observations to prevent overwhelming observers’ CJ, especially during urgent and complex medical surgical or mental health scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open Nursing
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251330034
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Describing How Scenario Topic, Situation Urgency and Complexity Level Impacts Simulation Observers’ Clinical Judgment: A Secondary Analysis

Beth Rogers
1 citations
SAGE Open Nursing
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
1.16
article

Describing How Scenario Topic, Situation Urgency and Complexity Level Impacts Simulation Observers’ Clinical Judgment: A Secondary Analysis

Beth Rogers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Nurses use clinical judgment (CJ), or the process of “thinking like a nurse” by recognizing and interpreting a patient's concerns, to guide care decisions. However, nursing students graduate without sufficient CJ for safe nursing practice. A prior investigation found observing simulations leads to significant, but inconsistent CJ gains, depending on learner ability. Observers watched diverse simulation designs with increasing complexity, highlighting the need to understand which conditions best support CJ development. Objective This secondary analysis of a prior investigation aims to describe how simulation designs (i.e., scenario topic and situation urgency) and complexity level impacts CJ. A secondary aim is to investigate how simulation designs and complexity level impacts CJ based on learner ability. Methods Sixty-one junior-level baccalaureate students participated in the study over a semester. Participants observed eight expert-modeled simulations, each focused on medical-surgical or mental health scenarios in either urgent or routine situations. After each simulation, participants responded to 11 CJ prompts, which were scored using the Lasater CJ Rubric (LCJR). The scenarios were rated for complexity (simple, moderate, difficult, complex) based on author-identified sources. Participants were grouped into low-, medium-, or high-ability categories based on their cumulative LCJR scores. Two separate two-way repeated measures ANOVAs examined how simulation topics and situation urgency influenced CJ, with analyses repeated for each ability group. Results Observers’ mean CJ is influenced by both simulation design and complexity level. CJ decreases in complex medical-surgical and mental health scenarios as complexity exceeds a “difficult” rating, regardless of ability. However, CJ improves in simple and moderately complex routine situations. Observing “difficult” and “complex” simulations hindered significant CJ gains, regardless of ability. Conclusions Nurse educators should consider learner ability and complexity level when designing simulation observations to prevent overwhelming observers’ CJ, especially during urgent and complex medical surgical or mental health scenarios.

SAGE Open NursingVol. 11
Texas Christian University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.