The Prediction of Intrapartum Fetal Compromise According to the Expected Fetal Weight

<b>Objectives:</b> To assess the predictive accuracy of the expected fetal weight in the third trimester (ExFW3t), based on the estimated fetal weight (EFW) at mid-trimester ultrasound scan, for the prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) (an abnormal intrapartum fetal heart rate or intrapartum fetal scalp pH requiring urgent cesarean section). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 777 singleton pregnancies that underwent a 20-week study and a 3t scan. The extrapolated EFW at 20 weeks to the 3t or ExFW3t was considered a proxy of the potential growth. The percentage difference with the actual 3t EFW (%ExFW3t) was compared with other ultrasonographic and clinical parameters-EFW centile (EFWc), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA PI) in multiples of the median (MoM), umbilical artery (UA) PI MoM, cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) MoM, and maternal height-for the prediction of IFC by means of the area under the curve (AUC) and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). <b>Results:</b> Pregnancies with IFC presented higher values of UA PI MoM (1.19 vs. 1.09, <i>p</i> = 0.0460) and lower values of population and Intergrowth EFWc (45.9 vs. 28.9, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, 48.4 vs. 33.6, <i>p</i> = 0.0004), MCA PI MoM (0.97 vs. 0.81, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), CPR MoM (1.01 vs. 0.79, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), %ExFW3t (89.9% vs. 97.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.0003), and maternal height (160.2 vs. 162.9, <i>p</i> = 0.0083). Univariable analysis selected maternal height, EFWc, %ExFW3t, and UA PI MoM as significant parameters. However, %ExFW3t did not surpass the prediction ability of cerebral Doppler. Finally, multivariable analysis showed that the best models for the prediction of IFC resulted from the combination of cerebral Doppler (MCA PI MoM or CPR MoM), fetal weight (%ExFW3t or EFWc), and maternal height (AUC 0.75/0.76, AIC 345, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Fetal weight-related parameters, including %ExFW3t, a proxy of the proportion of potential growth achieved in the 3t, were less effective than fetal cerebral Doppler for the prediction of IFC. The best performance was achieved by combining hemodynamic, ponderal, and clinical data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15040140
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prediction of Intrapartum Fetal Compromise According to the Expected Fetal Weight

Blanca Novillo-Del Álamo, Asma A. Khalil, José Morales-­Roselló­, Alicia Martínez‐Varea et al.
1 citations
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
2.06
article

The Prediction of Intrapartum Fetal Compromise According to the Expected Fetal Weight

Blanca Novillo-Del Álamo, Asma A. Khalil, José Morales-­Roselló­, Alicia Martínez‐Varea, Carmen Sánchez-Arco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> To assess the predictive accuracy of the expected fetal weight in the third trimester (ExFW3t), based on the estimated fetal weight (EFW) at mid-trimester ultrasound scan, for the prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) (an abnormal intrapartum fetal heart rate or intrapartum fetal scalp pH requiring urgent cesarean section). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 777 singleton pregnancies that underwent a 20-week study and a 3t scan. The extrapolated EFW at 20 weeks to the 3t or ExFW3t was considered a proxy of the potential growth. The percentage difference with the actual 3t EFW (%ExFW3t) was compared with other ultrasonographic and clinical parameters-EFW centile (EFWc), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA PI) in multiples of the median (MoM), umbilical artery (UA) PI MoM, cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) MoM, and maternal height-for the prediction of IFC by means of the area under the curve (AUC) and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). <b>Results:</b> Pregnancies with IFC presented higher values of UA PI MoM (1.19 vs. 1.09, <i>p</i> = 0.0460) and lower values of population and Intergrowth EFWc (45.9 vs. 28.9, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, 48.4 vs. 33.6, <i>p</i> = 0.0004), MCA PI MoM (0.97 vs. 0.81, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), CPR MoM (1.01 vs. 0.79, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), %ExFW3t (89.9% vs. 97.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.0003), and maternal height (160.2 vs. 162.9, <i>p</i> = 0.0083). Univariable analysis selected maternal height, EFWc, %ExFW3t, and UA PI MoM as significant parameters. However, %ExFW3t did not surpass the prediction ability of cerebral Doppler. Finally, multivariable analysis showed that the best models for the prediction of IFC resulted from the combination of cerebral Doppler (MCA PI MoM or CPR MoM), fetal weight (%ExFW3t or EFWc), and maternal height (AUC 0.75/0.76, AIC 345, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Fetal weight-related parameters, including %ExFW3t, a proxy of the proportion of potential growth achieved in the 3t, were less effective than fetal cerebral Doppler for the prediction of IFC. The best performance was achieved by combining hemodynamic, ponderal, and clinical data.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 15(4)
Universitat de València (ES), St George's, University of London (GB), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), St George's Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.