A Comparison of Array Configurations in Python-Based Software for ERT Data in Shallow Hazard Detection

Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) is a widely used geophysical technique for imaging subsurface resistivity variations, providing critical insights for geological engineering and hazard assessment applications. While open-source inversion tools such as BERT and PyGIMLi offer accessible solutions for geoelectrical modeling, their comparative performance across different electrode configurations and noise conditions remains underexplored. This study evaluates the effectiveness of these software packages in reconstructing subsurface anomalies related to cavity detection and landslide assessment. Four commonly used electrode configurations—dipole–dipole, Schlumberger, Wenner-Alpha, and Wenner-Beta—were tested on two synthetic models designed to simulate real geological conditions: one representing cavity detection and the other simulating a landslide scenario. Inversions were conducted under both ideal conditions and with synthetic noise to assess their robustness against measurement uncertainties. Results indicate that while all configurations successfully identified major subsurface features, the dipole–dipole array provided the highest resolution for detecting small-scale anomalies. BERT demonstrated superior accuracy under ideal conditions, while PyGIMLi showed consistent performance across multiple configurations, particularly in resolving smaller features under noisy conditions. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate electrode configurations to enhance imaging accuracy and ensure reliable geo-electrical data interpretation. This study highlights the robustness of open-source geophysical software for subsurface investigations and provides practical insights into optimizing geoelectrical survey configurations for shallow hazard detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15040127
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Array Configurations in Python-Based Software for ERT Data in Shallow Hazard Detection

Marcos A. Martínez-Segura, Mimoun Chourak, Pedro Martínez‐Pagán, Ximena Capa-Camacho et al.
Geosciences
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

A Comparison of Array Configurations in Python-Based Software for ERT Data in Shallow Hazard Detection

Marcos A. Martínez-Segura, Mimoun Chourak, Pedro Martínez‐Pagán, Ximena Capa-Camacho, Oussama Jabrane, K. Delimi
article en

Abstract

Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) is a widely used geophysical technique for imaging subsurface resistivity variations, providing critical insights for geological engineering and hazard assessment applications. While open-source inversion tools such as BERT and PyGIMLi offer accessible solutions for geoelectrical modeling, their comparative performance across different electrode configurations and noise conditions remains underexplored. This study evaluates the effectiveness of these software packages in reconstructing subsurface anomalies related to cavity detection and landslide assessment. Four commonly used electrode configurations—dipole–dipole, Schlumberger, Wenner-Alpha, and Wenner-Beta—were tested on two synthetic models designed to simulate real geological conditions: one representing cavity detection and the other simulating a landslide scenario. Inversions were conducted under both ideal conditions and with synthetic noise to assess their robustness against measurement uncertainties. Results indicate that while all configurations successfully identified major subsurface features, the dipole–dipole array provided the highest resolution for detecting small-scale anomalies. BERT demonstrated superior accuracy under ideal conditions, while PyGIMLi showed consistent performance across multiple configurations, particularly in resolving smaller features under noisy conditions. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate electrode configurations to enhance imaging accuracy and ensure reliable geo-electrical data interpretation. This study highlights the robustness of open-source geophysical software for subsurface investigations and provides practical insights into optimizing geoelectrical survey configurations for shallow hazard detection.

GeosciencesVol. 15(4)
Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (ES), Mohamed I University (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.