Differences between laboratory scanner and intra-oral scanner regarding axes and distances of three implants in a curved line when using two types of intra-oral scan bodies: in vitro study
ISB geometry influenced all four parameters: intra-implant distance, intra-implant angle, inter-implant distance and inter-implant angle. MIS ISB trapezoid geometry resulted significantly lower mean error regarding most parameters except intra-implant angle. ZZ ISB cylindrical geometry had a good impact only on the intra-implant angle.
Authors
- Gil Ben-Izhack (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-0264)
- Asaf Shely (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3436-4411)
- T Shaghaghi Shirazi
- Yifat Manor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6207-4078)
- Joseph Nissan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-4357)
- Diva Lugassy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-0493)
- Fayez F. Safadi
Institutions
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Advanced Inhalation Therapies (Israel) (IL)
- Assaf Harofeh Medical Center (IL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Implant Dentistry
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-025-00617-7
- Primary Topic
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00