Learning Algorithms for Verification of Markov Decision Processes

We present a general framework for applying learning algorithms and heuristical guidance to the verification of Markov decision processes (MDPs). The primary goal of our techniques is to improve performance by avoiding an exhaustive exploration of the state space, instead focussing on particularly relevant areas of the system, guided by heuristics. Our work builds on the previous results of Br{\'{a}}zdil et al., significantly extending it as well as refining several details and fixing errors. The presented framework focuses on probabilistic reachability, which is a core problem in verification, and is instantiated in two distinct scenarios. The first assumes that full knowledge of the MDP is available, in particular precise transition probabilities. It performs a heuristic-driven partial exploration of the model, yielding precise lower and upper bounds on the required probability. The second tackles the case where we may only sample the MDP without knowing the exact transition dynamics. Here, we obtain probabilistic guarantees, again in terms of both the lower and upper bounds, which provides efficient stopping criteria for the approximation. In particular, the latter is an extension of statistical model-checking (SMC) for unbounded properties in MDPs. In contrast to other related approaches, we do not restrict our attention to time-bounded (finite-horizon) or discounted properties, nor assume any particular structural properties of the MDP. Comment: 82 pages. This is the TheoretiCS journal version

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TheoretiCS
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46298/theoretics.25.10
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning Algorithms for Verification of Markov Decision Processes

Tobias Meggendorfer, David Parker, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin Chmelík et al.
1 citations
TheoretiCS
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
2.28
article

Learning Algorithms for Verification of Markov Decision Processes

Tobias Meggendorfer, David Parker, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin Chmelík, Jan Křetínský, Mateusz Ujma, Marta Kwiatkowska, Tomǎš Brázdil, Vojtěch Forejt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We present a general framework for applying learning algorithms and heuristical guidance to the verification of Markov decision processes (MDPs). The primary goal of our techniques is to improve performance by avoiding an exhaustive exploration of the state space, instead focussing on particularly relevant areas of the system, guided by heuristics. Our work builds on the previous results of Br{\'{a}}zdil et al., significantly extending it as well as refining several details and fixing errors. The presented framework focuses on probabilistic reachability, which is a core problem in verification, and is instantiated in two distinct scenarios. The first assumes that full knowledge of the MDP is available, in particular precise transition probabilities. It performs a heuristic-driven partial exploration of the model, yielding precise lower and upper bounds on the required probability. The second tackles the case where we may only sample the MDP without knowing the exact transition dynamics. Here, we obtain probabilistic guarantees, again in terms of both the lower and upper bounds, which provides efficient stopping criteria for the approximation. In particular, the latter is an extension of statistical model-checking (SMC) for unbounded properties in MDPs. In contrast to other related approaches, we do not restrict our attention to time-bounded (finite-horizon) or discounted properties, nor assume any particular structural properties of the MDP. Comment: 82 pages. This is the TheoretiCS journal version

TheoretiCSVol. Volume 4
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grantová Agentura České Republiky, Austrian Science Fund, Masarykova Univerzita, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
2.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.