Comparison of Time Series Regression, Support Vector Regression, Hybrid, and Ensemble Method to Forecast PM2.5

Introduction: PM2.5 pollution poses significant health risks, particularly in Jakarta, where levels often exceed safety thresholds. Accurate forecasting models are essential for air quality management and mitigation strategies.Methods: This study compares four forecasting models: Time Series Regression (TSR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), a hybrid TSR-SVR model, and an ensemble approach. The dataset consists of 9,119 hourly PM2.5 observations from January 1, 2023, to January 15, 2024. Missing values were imputed using historical hourly trends. Model performance was evaluated using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).Results: The hybrid TSR-SVR model achieved the lowest RMSE (6.829), outperforming TSR (7.595), SVR (7.477), and the ensemble method (7.486). The hybrid approach effectively captures both linear and nonlinear patterns in PM2.5 fluctuations, making it the most accurate model.Conclusions: Integrating statistical and machine learning models improves PM2.5 forecasting accuracy, aiding policymakers in pollution control efforts. Future studies should explore additional external factors to enhance prediction performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data & Metadata
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025862
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Time Series Regression, Support Vector Regression, Hybrid, and Ensemble Method to Forecast PM2.5

Adma Novita Sari, Sediono Sediono, Elly Pusporani, M. Fariz Fadillah Mardianto et al.
Data & Metadata
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Comparison of Time Series Regression, Support Vector Regression, Hybrid, and Ensemble Method to Forecast PM2.5

Adma Novita Sari, Sediono Sediono, Elly Pusporani, M. Fariz Fadillah Mardianto, Ghisella Asy Sifa, Pressylia Aluisina Putri Widyangga, Nurin Faizun
article en

Abstract

Introduction: PM2.5 pollution poses significant health risks, particularly in Jakarta, where levels often exceed safety thresholds. Accurate forecasting models are essential for air quality management and mitigation strategies.Methods: This study compares four forecasting models: Time Series Regression (TSR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), a hybrid TSR-SVR model, and an ensemble approach. The dataset consists of 9,119 hourly PM2.5 observations from January 1, 2023, to January 15, 2024. Missing values were imputed using historical hourly trends. Model performance was evaluated using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).Results: The hybrid TSR-SVR model achieved the lowest RMSE (6.829), outperforming TSR (7.595), SVR (7.477), and the ensemble method (7.486). The hybrid approach effectively captures both linear and nonlinear patterns in PM2.5 fluctuations, making it the most accurate model.Conclusions: Integrating statistical and machine learning models improves PM2.5 forecasting accuracy, aiding policymakers in pollution control efforts. Future studies should explore additional external factors to enhance prediction performance.

Data & MetadataVol. 4
Universitas Airlangga (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Time Series Regression, Support Vector Regression, Hybrid, and Ensemble Method to Forecast PM2.5 — Adma Novita Sari, Sediono Sediono, et al. · Data & Metadata (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS