Evaluating long-term usage patterns of open source datasets: A citation network approach

The evaluation of datasets serves as a fundamental basis for tasks in evaluatology. Evaluating the usage patterns of datasets has a significant impact on the selection of appropriate datasets. Many renowned Open Source datasets are well-established and have not been updated for many years, yet they continue to be widely used by a large number of researchers. Due to this characteristic, conventional Open Source metrics (e.g., number of stars, issues, and activity) are insufficient for evaluating the long-term usage patterns based on log activity data from their GitHub repositories. Researchers often encounter significant challenges in selecting appropriate datasets due to the lack of insight into how these datasets are being utilized. To address this challenge, this paper proposes establishing a connection between Open Source datasets and the citation networks of their corresponding academic papers. By mining the citation network of the corresponding academic paper, we can obtain rich graph-structured information, such as citation times, authors, and more. Utilizing this information, we can evaluate the long-term usage patterns of the associated Open Source dataset. Furthermore, this paper conducts extensive experiments based on five major dataset categories (Texts, Images, Videos, Audio, Medical) to demonstrate that the proposed method effectively evaluates the long-term usage patterns of Open Source datasets. Additionally, the insights gained from the experimental results can serve as a valuable reference for future researchers in selecting appropriate datasets for their work. • We propose an innovative approach that connects the GitHub repositories of open-source datasets with the citation networks of their corresponding academic papers. Beyond addressing the direct challenges in existing dataset evaluation methods, this dual perspective enriches our understanding of the open-source ecosystem. • We explore potential collaboration patterns within the corresponding GitHub repositories by mining various collaboration networks. These networks provide valuable insights into the underlying reasons for the repository’s development and sustained influence, shedding light on the factors driving its continued growth and relevance in the open-source ecosystem. • The findings presented in this work aspire to serve as a guide for researchers, dataset curators, and policymakers, fostering a deeper appreciation of the long-term value of Open Source datasets and their critical role in advancing scientific. discovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and Evaluations
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2025.100199
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating long-term usage patterns of open source datasets: A citation network approach

Fanyu Han, Wei Wang, Jiaheng Peng
BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and Evaluations
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

Evaluating long-term usage patterns of open source datasets: A citation network approach

Fanyu Han, Wei Wang, Jiaheng Peng
article en

Abstract

The evaluation of datasets serves as a fundamental basis for tasks in evaluatology. Evaluating the usage patterns of datasets has a significant impact on the selection of appropriate datasets. Many renowned Open Source datasets are well-established and have not been updated for many years, yet they continue to be widely used by a large number of researchers. Due to this characteristic, conventional Open Source metrics (e.g., number of stars, issues, and activity) are insufficient for evaluating the long-term usage patterns based on log activity data from their GitHub repositories. Researchers often encounter significant challenges in selecting appropriate datasets due to the lack of insight into how these datasets are being utilized. To address this challenge, this paper proposes establishing a connection between Open Source datasets and the citation networks of their corresponding academic papers. By mining the citation network of the corresponding academic paper, we can obtain rich graph-structured information, such as citation times, authors, and more. Utilizing this information, we can evaluate the long-term usage patterns of the associated Open Source dataset. Furthermore, this paper conducts extensive experiments based on five major dataset categories (Texts, Images, Videos, Audio, Medical) to demonstrate that the proposed method effectively evaluates the long-term usage patterns of Open Source datasets. Additionally, the insights gained from the experimental results can serve as a valuable reference for future researchers in selecting appropriate datasets for their work. • We propose an innovative approach that connects the GitHub repositories of open-source datasets with the citation networks of their corresponding academic papers. Beyond addressing the direct challenges in existing dataset evaluation methods, this dual perspective enriches our understanding of the open-source ecosystem. • We explore potential collaboration patterns within the corresponding GitHub repositories by mining various collaboration networks. These networks provide valuable insights into the underlying reasons for the repository’s development and sustained influence, shedding light on the factors driving its continued growth and relevance in the open-source ecosystem. • The findings presented in this work aspire to serve as a guide for researchers, dataset curators, and policymakers, fostering a deeper appreciation of the long-term value of Open Source datasets and their critical role in advancing scientific. discovery.

BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and EvaluationsVol. 4(4)
Beijing Institute of Big Data Research (CN), East China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.