Generative AI and South Africa's intellectual property law: Exploring a balance between protectionism and innovation

The development and increased use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, raises pressing legal issues. AI impacts every aspect of the law, including intellectual property law. Human beings are no longer the masters of innovation: the question that arises, then, is whether AI-generated inventions should be legally recognised and protected. This article aims to contribute to the debate surrounding the complexities of protecting and regulating AI-generated inventions and the possible departure from human inventorship in the light of current technological advancement. It is argued that a rethinking and modification of some of the intellectual property rules, particularly in the context of patents, is required in order to ensure a balance of protectionism and innovation. The article stresses the need for a proactive approach and inclusive legal framework that accommodates the rise of generative AI while ensuring fair and appropriate protection for human inventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Democracy & Development
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/2077-4907/2025/ldd.v29.2
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI and South Africa's intellectual property law: Exploring a balance between protectionism and innovation

Yeukai Mupangavanhu
Law Democracy & Development
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Generative AI and South Africa's intellectual property law: Exploring a balance between protectionism and innovation

Yeukai Mupangavanhu
article en

Abstract

The development and increased use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, raises pressing legal issues. AI impacts every aspect of the law, including intellectual property law. Human beings are no longer the masters of innovation: the question that arises, then, is whether AI-generated inventions should be legally recognised and protected. This article aims to contribute to the debate surrounding the complexities of protecting and regulating AI-generated inventions and the possible departure from human inventorship in the light of current technological advancement. It is argued that a rethinking and modification of some of the intellectual property rules, particularly in the context of patents, is required in order to ensure a balance of protectionism and innovation. The article stresses the need for a proactive approach and inclusive legal framework that accommodates the rise of generative AI while ensuring fair and appropriate protection for human inventions.

Law Democracy & DevelopmentVol. 29
University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.