Comparative Study of Bupivacaine-Dexmeditomidine and Bupivacaine-Fentanyl with Bupivacaine Plain as Local Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia After Abdominal Hysterectomy Under Subarachnoid Block

Introduction: Abdominal hysterectomy is a common surgical procedure associated with significant postoperative pain. Effective pain management is crucial to enhance recovery and reduce opioid dependency. Multimodal analgesia, including local wound infiltration with adjuvants, has been explored to optimize pain control. This study compares the efficacy of bupivacaine alone, bupivacaine with fentanyl, and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Materials and Methods: This hospital-based observational study was conducted at MES Medical College over one year. A total of 81 patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy under subarachnoid block were randomly allocated into three groups: Group B (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine), Group F (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 20 mcg fentanyl), and Group D (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 20 mcg dexmedetomidine). Postoperatively, hemodynamic parameters, pain scores using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), time to first rescue analgesia, and total rescue analgesic consumption were assessed over 24 hours. SPSS 15 was used for statistical analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: Among the groups, demographic characteristics and duration of surgery were comparable. Group D demonstrated a significantly prolonged duration of analgesia (5.4 ± 1.2 hours) compared to Group F (3.1 ± 1.1 hours) and Group B (2.6 ± 1.3 hours) (p < 0.001). The time to first rescue analgesia was longest in Group D (7.6 ± 1.5 hours) (p < 0.001). Total rescue analgesic consumption was lowest in Group D, followed by Group F, and highest in Group B (p < 0.001). Adverse effects were minimal across all groups. Hemodynamic stability was also seen among all groups. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for local wound infiltration provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to fentanyl or bupivacaine alone, with a significantly prolonged analgesic duration and reduced need for rescue analgesics. Dexmedetomidine is a promising adjuvant for improving postoperative pain management in abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61770/nbejms.2025.v03.i04.007
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Bupivacaine-Dexmeditomidine and Bupivacaine-Fentanyl with Bupivacaine Plain as Local Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia After Abdominal Hysterectomy Under Subarachnoid Block

Neethu Vijayakumar Sheela, Shabeel Aboobacker, Brejesh Ravi Varma, Ashitha Koyaparambath
1 links
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparative Study of Bupivacaine-Dexmeditomidine and Bupivacaine-Fentanyl with Bupivacaine Plain as Local Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia After Abdominal Hysterectomy Under Subarachnoid Block

Neethu Vijayakumar Sheela, Shabeel Aboobacker, Brejesh Ravi Varma, Ashitha Koyaparambath
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Abdominal hysterectomy is a common surgical procedure associated with significant postoperative pain. Effective pain management is crucial to enhance recovery and reduce opioid dependency. Multimodal analgesia, including local wound infiltration with adjuvants, has been explored to optimize pain control. This study compares the efficacy of bupivacaine alone, bupivacaine with fentanyl, and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Materials and Methods: This hospital-based observational study was conducted at MES Medical College over one year. A total of 81 patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy under subarachnoid block were randomly allocated into three groups: Group B (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine), Group F (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 20 mcg fentanyl), and Group D (20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 20 mcg dexmedetomidine). Postoperatively, hemodynamic parameters, pain scores using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), time to first rescue analgesia, and total rescue analgesic consumption were assessed over 24 hours. SPSS 15 was used for statistical analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: Among the groups, demographic characteristics and duration of surgery were comparable. Group D demonstrated a significantly prolonged duration of analgesia (5.4 ± 1.2 hours) compared to Group F (3.1 ± 1.1 hours) and Group B (2.6 ± 1.3 hours) (p < 0.001). The time to first rescue analgesia was longest in Group D (7.6 ± 1.5 hours) (p < 0.001). Total rescue analgesic consumption was lowest in Group D, followed by Group F, and highest in Group B (p < 0.001). Adverse effects were minimal across all groups. Hemodynamic stability was also seen among all groups. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for local wound infiltration provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to fentanyl or bupivacaine alone, with a significantly prolonged analgesic duration and reduced need for rescue analgesics. Dexmedetomidine is a promising adjuvant for improving postoperative pain management in abdominal hysterectomy.

NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCESVol. 3(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.