The Perceptions of Patients, Carers and Clinicians Relating to SACT Decision‐Making in Older People With Cancer: Qualitative Findings From the Electronic Frailty Index (eFI) in Cancer Study

Objective: To explore the perceptions and experiences of patients, carers and clinicians relating to treatment decision‐making in older people with cancer, and to investigate the acceptability of the eFI as a tool to influence decisions about SACT. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 28 participants (12 clinicians, 10 patients and 6 carers) at an NHS cancer day unit in South East England. Patients were > 60 years and had received at least one cycle of SACT. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results: Two themes were identified. Theme one highlighted that the assessment of frailty is a variable and complex task. However, an individualised assessment incorporating a balance between quality of life and the potential benefit of treatment is fundamentally important. Theme two identified that eFI is an acceptable addition to SACT decision‐making which must be discussed with the patient and considered within the context of each individual situation. Conclusion: The eFI is acceptable for use in assessing the frailty of older people with cancer prior to starting SACT. In‐depth, individualised assessment prior to SACT is important in this population, but it is not always realistic. Incorporating the eFI into SACT decision‐making offers the potential to address this challenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cancer Care
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ecc/4399728
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Perceptions of Patients, Carers and Clinicians Relating to SACT Decision‐Making in Older People With Cancer: Qualitative Findings From the Electronic Frailty Index (eFI) in Cancer Study

Simon S. Skene, Katie Sutton, Agnieszka Michael, Jo Armes et al.
European Journal of Cancer Care
Frailty in Older Adults
article

The Perceptions of Patients, Carers and Clinicians Relating to SACT Decision‐Making in Older People With Cancer: Qualitative Findings From the Electronic Frailty Index (eFI) in Cancer Study

Simon S. Skene, Katie Sutton, Agnieszka Michael, Jo Armes, Janine Mansi
article en

Abstract

Objective: To explore the perceptions and experiences of patients, carers and clinicians relating to treatment decision‐making in older people with cancer, and to investigate the acceptability of the eFI as a tool to influence decisions about SACT. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 28 participants (12 clinicians, 10 patients and 6 carers) at an NHS cancer day unit in South East England. Patients were > 60 years and had received at least one cycle of SACT. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results: Two themes were identified. Theme one highlighted that the assessment of frailty is a variable and complex task. However, an individualised assessment incorporating a balance between quality of life and the potential benefit of treatment is fundamentally important. Theme two identified that eFI is an acceptable addition to SACT decision‐making which must be discussed with the patient and considered within the context of each individual situation. Conclusion: The eFI is acceptable for use in assessing the frailty of older people with cancer prior to starting SACT. In‐depth, individualised assessment prior to SACT is important in this population, but it is not always realistic. Incorporating the eFI into SACT decision‐making offers the potential to address this challenge.

European Journal of Cancer CareVol. 2025(1)
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Surrey (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.