Interaction between Russia and China in the military-technical field: features and trends

The article examines the main directions of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China, including the transfer and adaptation of military technologies. It analyzes the process of reverse engineering of Russian weapons samples, as well as their modernization in China with subsequent implementation in national armament programs. Particular attention is paid to aviation technologies, including Russian jet engines and their use in Chinese fighters Chengdu J-20 and Shenyang J-35/FC-31. Examples of borrowing electronic systems are discussed, such as shipborne radars "Frigate" (type 382) and fire control systems type 366, as well as the modernization of anti-aircraft missile systems, including analogs of Russian SAM systems "Tor-M1" and "Pantsir-S". Special attention is given to technology transfer in the field of submarines, including diesel-electric submarines of the "Kilo" class and their Chinese analogs of type 041 with air-independent propulsion. The methodological foundation of this study is an interdisciplinary approach based on the main tenets and methods of structural realism (neorealism). Referring to this scientific school allows for an analysis of the tools and substantive content of Russian-Chinese cooperation in the military-technical sphere. In conclusion, the author notes that the transfer of technologies from Russia to China is a trend in Russian-Chinese military-technical cooperation, and there are no prerequisites for its change. A forecast is made that this trend will continue, given China's strong desire to develop its own defense manufacturing capabilities. The article conducts a comparative analysis of Chinese and Russian weaponry, demonstrating the degree of technological divergence and identifies trends towards reducing China's dependence on Russian military technologies. Additionally, a perspective on bilateral cooperation is presented in light of current geopolitical challenges and potential risks for the Russian defense industry. The author predicts that in the absence of fundamental changes in this area, a scenario that would be beneficial for Russia is gaining broader access to Chinese commercial technologies and dual-use technologies, which would help both maintain its defense industry in the context of military confrontation with the Collective West and develop a more innovative economy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Конфликтология / nota bene
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0617.2025.1.73872
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interaction between Russia and China in the military-technical field: features and trends

Valerii N. Li
1 citations
Конфликтология / nota bene
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.20
article

Interaction between Russia and China in the military-technical field: features and trends

Valerii N. Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article examines the main directions of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China, including the transfer and adaptation of military technologies. It analyzes the process of reverse engineering of Russian weapons samples, as well as their modernization in China with subsequent implementation in national armament programs. Particular attention is paid to aviation technologies, including Russian jet engines and their use in Chinese fighters Chengdu J-20 and Shenyang J-35/FC-31. Examples of borrowing electronic systems are discussed, such as shipborne radars "Frigate" (type 382) and fire control systems type 366, as well as the modernization of anti-aircraft missile systems, including analogs of Russian SAM systems "Tor-M1" and "Pantsir-S". Special attention is given to technology transfer in the field of submarines, including diesel-electric submarines of the "Kilo" class and their Chinese analogs of type 041 with air-independent propulsion. The methodological foundation of this study is an interdisciplinary approach based on the main tenets and methods of structural realism (neorealism). Referring to this scientific school allows for an analysis of the tools and substantive content of Russian-Chinese cooperation in the military-technical sphere. In conclusion, the author notes that the transfer of technologies from Russia to China is a trend in Russian-Chinese military-technical cooperation, and there are no prerequisites for its change. A forecast is made that this trend will continue, given China's strong desire to develop its own defense manufacturing capabilities. The article conducts a comparative analysis of Chinese and Russian weaponry, demonstrating the degree of technological divergence and identifies trends towards reducing China's dependence on Russian military technologies. Additionally, a perspective on bilateral cooperation is presented in light of current geopolitical challenges and potential risks for the Russian defense industry. The author predicts that in the absence of fundamental changes in this area, a scenario that would be beneficial for Russia is gaining broader access to Chinese commercial technologies and dual-use technologies, which would help both maintain its defense industry in the context of military confrontation with the Collective West and develop a more innovative economy.

Конфликтология / nota bene(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interaction between Russia and China in the military-technical field: features and trends — Valerii N. Li · Конфликтология / nota bene (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS