Concept, characteristics and types of customs disputes related to assessment and collection of customs payments

This article explores the concept, characteristics, and types of customs disputes related to the assessment and collection of customs payments. The relevance of this topic arises from the critical role customs payments play in replenishing Ukraine’s state budget, which simultaneously creates risks of rights violations by customs authorities and an imbalance between public and private interests. Currently, the most effective way to protect the violated rights is referring to the court for the purpose of consideration and resolution of the respective customs disputes. It has been established that conducting scientific inquiries into the administrative and legal aspects of resolving customs disputes regarding the assessment and collection of customs payments requires a solid theoretical and legal foundation, including clear definitions of key concepts. Consequently, the article analyzes terms ranging from general ones (such as “dispute” and “legal dispute”) to more specific ones (such as “customs dispute” and “customs disputes relating to the assessment and collection of customs payments”). The article identifies the essential characteristics of the customs disputes, their causes, preconditions, and offers an original approach to classification of the customs disputes. Thus, a dialectical relationship has been traced between the concepts of “dispute”, “legal dispute”, “public-law dispute”, “administrative-law dispute”, “customs dispute” and “customs dispute regarding the assessment and collection of customs payments”. It has been established that, unlike other categories of legal disputes, a customs dispute, as a type of administrative-legal dispute, is inherently characterized by conflict, as its participants are private persons/ entities and customs authorities (structural departments of the public administration system). At the same time, it has been concluded that the concepts of “conflict” and “dispute” are not identical. A legal conflict in the customs sphere serves as a prerequisite for initiation and conduct of the proceedings in the customs dispute. Finally, based on general approaches to the characteristics and types of customs disputes and an analysis of the specific features of customs disputes related to the assessment and collection of customs payments, the author suggests his own view towards the list of characteristics and types of the customs disputes. Although the article has a more theoretical rather than a practical focus, similar scientific developments provide for a structural and meaningful impetus for further research into the pressing issues of resolving customs disputes related to the assessment and collection of customs payments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Visegrad Journal on Human Rights
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.6.2
Primary Topic
Polish Law and Legal System
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concept, characteristics and types of customs disputes related to assessment and collection of customs payments

Ievgen Bidnyi
Visegrad Journal on Human Rights
Polish Law and Legal System
article

Concept, characteristics and types of customs disputes related to assessment and collection of customs payments

Ievgen Bidnyi
article en

Abstract

This article explores the concept, characteristics, and types of customs disputes related to the assessment and collection of customs payments. The relevance of this topic arises from the critical role customs payments play in replenishing Ukraine’s state budget, which simultaneously creates risks of rights violations by customs authorities and an imbalance between public and private interests. Currently, the most effective way to protect the violated rights is referring to the court for the purpose of consideration and resolution of the respective customs disputes. It has been established that conducting scientific inquiries into the administrative and legal aspects of resolving customs disputes regarding the assessment and collection of customs payments requires a solid theoretical and legal foundation, including clear definitions of key concepts. Consequently, the article analyzes terms ranging from general ones (such as “dispute” and “legal dispute”) to more specific ones (such as “customs dispute” and “customs disputes relating to the assessment and collection of customs payments”). The article identifies the essential characteristics of the customs disputes, their causes, preconditions, and offers an original approach to classification of the customs disputes. Thus, a dialectical relationship has been traced between the concepts of “dispute”, “legal dispute”, “public-law dispute”, “administrative-law dispute”, “customs dispute” and “customs dispute regarding the assessment and collection of customs payments”. It has been established that, unlike other categories of legal disputes, a customs dispute, as a type of administrative-legal dispute, is inherently characterized by conflict, as its participants are private persons/ entities and customs authorities (structural departments of the public administration system). At the same time, it has been concluded that the concepts of “conflict” and “dispute” are not identical. A legal conflict in the customs sphere serves as a prerequisite for initiation and conduct of the proceedings in the customs dispute. Finally, based on general approaches to the characteristics and types of customs disputes and an analysis of the specific features of customs disputes related to the assessment and collection of customs payments, the author suggests his own view towards the list of characteristics and types of the customs disputes. Although the article has a more theoretical rather than a practical focus, similar scientific developments provide for a structural and meaningful impetus for further research into the pressing issues of resolving customs disputes related to the assessment and collection of customs payments.

Visegrad Journal on Human Rights(6)
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Polish Law and Legal System
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.