A study of nonlinear hydrodynamic and mooring modelling for the Volturn floating wind platform in comparison with experiments

• Catenary moored wind platform model validated in focussed waves and decay tests. • Platform position movement accounted for in wave force improves predictions. • Lumped mass model MoorDyn gives better tension prediction than quasi-static model. • Choice of mooring model has little effect on platform motion. • MoorDyn fatigue damage estimation greater than given by quasi-static catenary model. For coupled hydrodynamic-aerodynamic-mooring models for floating offshore wind platforms, there has been little time domain validation against experimental data which can reveal the origin of uncertainties for this complex problem. Here we use data for focussed waves incident on the 15 MW Volturn semi-submersible platform at 1:70 scale and free decay tests where fairlead tensions and instantaneous platform position have been measured. This enables mooring models to be assessed independently with known fairlead motions. The catenary chain moorings are modelled by quasi-static theory and in lumped-mass form including dynamics and damping using the MoorDyn code. Tension predictions by MoorDyn with fairlead motion input were always highly accurate in both free decay and focussed waves while quasi-static theory only gave equivalent accuracy in surge decay tests. In relatively large focussed waves, motion prediction by coupled modelling was substantially improved by including the instantaneous platform position in the excitation force formulae, giving a simple nonlinear extension within an otherwise linear model (apart from the drag formulation). Both mooring models gave similar predictions of platform motion in free decay and focussed waves generally approximating experimental results. While mooring tension was well predicted by MoorDyn in all cases, quasi-static modelling again only gave good prediction for surge free decay. Irregular wave interactions at full-scale have also been simulated with wind thrust effect and the statistics of the platform motions and fairlead tensions are analysed, showing the importance of dynamic mooring effects on mooring fatigue but with little effect on maximum tension or platform motion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ocean Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2025.104550
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study of nonlinear hydrodynamic and mooring modelling for the Volturn floating wind platform in comparison with experiments

Peter Stansby, Gangqiang Li, Yi Zhang
9 citations
Applied Ocean Research
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
10.31
article

A study of nonlinear hydrodynamic and mooring modelling for the Volturn floating wind platform in comparison with experiments

Peter Stansby, Gangqiang Li, Yi Zhang
article en
9 citations

Abstract

• Catenary moored wind platform model validated in focussed waves and decay tests. • Platform position movement accounted for in wave force improves predictions. • Lumped mass model MoorDyn gives better tension prediction than quasi-static model. • Choice of mooring model has little effect on platform motion. • MoorDyn fatigue damage estimation greater than given by quasi-static catenary model. For coupled hydrodynamic-aerodynamic-mooring models for floating offshore wind platforms, there has been little time domain validation against experimental data which can reveal the origin of uncertainties for this complex problem. Here we use data for focussed waves incident on the 15 MW Volturn semi-submersible platform at 1:70 scale and free decay tests where fairlead tensions and instantaneous platform position have been measured. This enables mooring models to be assessed independently with known fairlead motions. The catenary chain moorings are modelled by quasi-static theory and in lumped-mass form including dynamics and damping using the MoorDyn code. Tension predictions by MoorDyn with fairlead motion input were always highly accurate in both free decay and focussed waves while quasi-static theory only gave equivalent accuracy in surge decay tests. In relatively large focussed waves, motion prediction by coupled modelling was substantially improved by including the instantaneous platform position in the excitation force formulae, giving a simple nonlinear extension within an otherwise linear model (apart from the drag formulation). Both mooring models gave similar predictions of platform motion in free decay and focussed waves generally approximating experimental results. While mooring tension was well predicted by MoorDyn in all cases, quasi-static modelling again only gave good prediction for surge free decay. Irregular wave interactions at full-scale have also been simulated with wind thrust effect and the statistics of the platform motions and fairlead tensions are analysed, showing the importance of dynamic mooring effects on mooring fatigue but with little effect on maximum tension or platform motion.

Applied Ocean ResearchVol. 158
Clarkson University (US), University of Manchester (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
10.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.