Case Note on BGH IX ZR 229/23

In BGH IX ZR 229/23, the German Bundesgerichtshof referred a case concerning Art. 16 EIR 2015 to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling. The case involves the partial repayment of an intercompany loan between an Austrian company and its German sister company, made four months before insolvency proceedings were initiated against the German borrower. The German insolvency practitioner sought to avoid the repayment under German transaction avoidance rules. However, the loan agreement was governed by Austrian law, which no longer permitted avoidance at the time of the challenge. This case note examines how Art. 16 EIR, by purporting to protect legitimate expectations where none exist, unnecessarily complicates the application of national avoidance provisions. It further questions whether a teleological reduction of Art. 16 EIR can resolve the inconsistencies raised in this case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54195/eirj.22254
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case Note on BGH IX ZR 229/23

Reinhard Bork
European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal
Corporate Governance and Law
article

Case Note on BGH IX ZR 229/23

Reinhard Bork
article en

Abstract

In BGH IX ZR 229/23, the German Bundesgerichtshof referred a case concerning Art. 16 EIR 2015 to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling. The case involves the partial repayment of an intercompany loan between an Austrian company and its German sister company, made four months before insolvency proceedings were initiated against the German borrower. The German insolvency practitioner sought to avoid the repayment under German transaction avoidance rules. However, the loan agreement was governed by Austrian law, which no longer permitted avoidance at the time of the challenge. This case note examines how Art. 16 EIR, by purporting to protect legitimate expectations where none exist, unnecessarily complicates the application of national avoidance provisions. It further questions whether a teleological reduction of Art. 16 EIR can resolve the inconsistencies raised in this case.

European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal
Universität Hamburg (DE), Manchester College (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.