Rigour in interpretive qualitative research in education: Ideas to think with

Abstract There has been a proliferation of qualitative approaches to researching education. While this has resulted in the construction of a rich tapestry of knowledge about education, it has also resulted in disparate research ideas, processes and practices, and created tensions relating to what constitutes rigorous qualitative research in education. As such, the aim of this paper was to use a multidisciplinary perspective and draw on concepts and practices relating to research coherence, reflexivity, transparency, authenticity, sincerity, credibility and ethics to (1) problematise traditional approaches to rigour in qualitative education research and (2) support those who do interpretive qualitative education research to select and embed relevant concepts and practices to increase and evidence the rigour of their work. I end this paper with an attempt to galvanise interpretive qualitative researchers in education to reflexively consider and justify the ways and extent to which their research decisions, processes and practices are rigorous.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4156
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rigour in interpretive qualitative research in education: Ideas to think with

Anthony John Maher
6 citations
British Educational Research Journal
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
12.64
article

Rigour in interpretive qualitative research in education: Ideas to think with

Anthony John Maher
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract There has been a proliferation of qualitative approaches to researching education. While this has resulted in the construction of a rich tapestry of knowledge about education, it has also resulted in disparate research ideas, processes and practices, and created tensions relating to what constitutes rigorous qualitative research in education. As such, the aim of this paper was to use a multidisciplinary perspective and draw on concepts and practices relating to research coherence, reflexivity, transparency, authenticity, sincerity, credibility and ethics to (1) problematise traditional approaches to rigour in qualitative education research and (2) support those who do interpretive qualitative education research to select and embed relevant concepts and practices to increase and evidence the rigour of their work. I end this paper with an attempt to galvanise interpretive qualitative researchers in education to reflexively consider and justify the ways and extent to which their research decisions, processes and practices are rigorous.

British Educational Research JournalVol. 51(5)
Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
12.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rigour in interpretive qualitative research in education: Ideas to think with — Anthony John Maher · British Educational Research Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS