Bridging Linguistic and Cultural Nuances: A Comparative Study of Human and AI Translations of Arabic Dialect Poetry

This study conducts a comparative analysis of human and AI translations of Arabic dialect poetry into English, focusing on Gulf, Levantine, and Egyptian Arabic dialects. The study reveals distinct strengths and limitations by evaluating both translation approaches across five critical criteria- form, word usage, poetic techniques, language conventions, and illustrations. Human translators excel in preserving the nuanced structure, rhythm, and cultural depth that are essential in poetry. For example, in the translation of Prince Khalid AlFaisal’s Gulf Arabic poem, (هقيت ما’ (I Thought Not’, human translators maintained the emotional rhythm and poetic structure that AI translations rendered in a more prose-like format. Additionally, human translators demonstrated greater sensitivity to culturally embedded words and idioms, as seen in their handling of idiomatic expressions and symbolic metaphors in Talal Haidar’s Levantine Arabic poem ‘Alone’ (وحدن (and Ahmad Fouad Najem’s Egyptian Arabic poem Alexandria (سكندريةٕا(. While often accurate in literal terms, the AI translations struggled with interpreting poetic devices like metaphor and alliteration and lacked the interpretive depth needed for conveying cultural and emotional nuances. Nonetheless, AI tools show potential as initial translators for generating draft translations that human experts can refine. The study concludes that, in the face of AI advances, human translators remain indispensable for capturing Arabic dialect poetry’s aesthetic, cultural, and emotional layers. This underscores the need for a collaborative model where AI serves as an assistant rather than a replacement for human expertise in literary translation. This research sheds light on AI’s role and limitations in the nuanced domain of poetry translation, thereby contributing to the field.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54364/aaiml.2025.51186
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
52.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Linguistic and Cultural Nuances: A Comparative Study of Human and AI Translations of Arabic Dialect Poetry

Thana Al-Shakhs, Mohammad Awad AlAfnan
5 citations
Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
52.11
article

Bridging Linguistic and Cultural Nuances: A Comparative Study of Human and AI Translations of Arabic Dialect Poetry

Thana Al-Shakhs, Mohammad Awad AlAfnan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of human and AI translations of Arabic dialect poetry into English, focusing on Gulf, Levantine, and Egyptian Arabic dialects. The study reveals distinct strengths and limitations by evaluating both translation approaches across five critical criteria- form, word usage, poetic techniques, language conventions, and illustrations. Human translators excel in preserving the nuanced structure, rhythm, and cultural depth that are essential in poetry. For example, in the translation of Prince Khalid AlFaisal’s Gulf Arabic poem, (هقيت ما’ (I Thought Not’, human translators maintained the emotional rhythm and poetic structure that AI translations rendered in a more prose-like format. Additionally, human translators demonstrated greater sensitivity to culturally embedded words and idioms, as seen in their handling of idiomatic expressions and symbolic metaphors in Talal Haidar’s Levantine Arabic poem ‘Alone’ (وحدن (and Ahmad Fouad Najem’s Egyptian Arabic poem Alexandria (سكندريةٕا(. While often accurate in literal terms, the AI translations struggled with interpreting poetic devices like metaphor and alliteration and lacked the interpretive depth needed for conveying cultural and emotional nuances. Nonetheless, AI tools show potential as initial translators for generating draft translations that human experts can refine. The study concludes that, in the face of AI advances, human translators remain indispensable for capturing Arabic dialect poetry’s aesthetic, cultural, and emotional layers. This underscores the need for a collaborative model where AI serves as an assistant rather than a replacement for human expertise in literary translation. This research sheds light on AI’s role and limitations in the nuanced domain of poetry translation, thereby contributing to the field.

Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine LearningVol. 05(01)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
52.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.