JOURNALISM: OPPORTUNITIES OF NEW COLLECTIVISM

The article substantiates the regularity of moving away from traditional notions of collectivism inherent in the Russian people, which are based on the institution of the peasant commune. The author refers to this type of collectivism as managed collectivism and illustrates its inefficiency with examples from the past of our country. In contrast, a more viable form of voluntary collectivism is presented, particularly characteristic of China. Defining it as new collectivism, the author notes that its habitat is the internet and social networks. Here, various new collectives are formed that correspond to the characteristics of traditional collectives – they unite for common activities based on shared interests. These associations may not be very durable and do not generate reliable social ties, especially virtual communities formed during discussions of topical publications in the media, internet, and social networks. Nevertheless, in the author’s opinion, they convincingly confirm their right to be called new collectives. They open up new opportunities for journalists to work more effectively. By highlighting some of these opportunities, the article formulates the conditions for their realization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sign problematic field in mediaeducation
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2025-55-1-67-71
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

JOURNALISM: OPPORTUNITIES OF NEW COLLECTIVISM

Boris N. Kirshin
Sign problematic field in mediaeducation
Media Studies and Communication
article

JOURNALISM: OPPORTUNITIES OF NEW COLLECTIVISM

Boris N. Kirshin
article en

Abstract

The article substantiates the regularity of moving away from traditional notions of collectivism inherent in the Russian people, which are based on the institution of the peasant commune. The author refers to this type of collectivism as managed collectivism and illustrates its inefficiency with examples from the past of our country. In contrast, a more viable form of voluntary collectivism is presented, particularly characteristic of China. Defining it as new collectivism, the author notes that its habitat is the internet and social networks. Here, various new collectives are formed that correspond to the characteristics of traditional collectives – they unite for common activities based on shared interests. These associations may not be very durable and do not generate reliable social ties, especially virtual communities formed during discussions of topical publications in the media, internet, and social networks. Nevertheless, in the author’s opinion, they convincingly confirm their right to be called new collectives. They open up new opportunities for journalists to work more effectively. By highlighting some of these opportunities, the article formulates the conditions for their realization.

Sign problematic field in mediaeducationVol. 55(1)
Chelyabinsk State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

JOURNALISM: OPPORTUNITIES OF NEW COLLECTIVISM — Boris N. Kirshin · Sign problematic field in mediaeducation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS