What is your type? Latent classes of newly married couples' gender ideologies

Abstract Objective This study aims to understand how married couples agree or disagree on gender ideologies, as well as what sociodemographic characteristics are related to these pairings. Background Past studies have explored the multidimensional nature of gender ideologies within individuals; however, this multidimensionality at the couple level is less understood. Although some research suggests couples will largely agree on gender ideologies, other theories imply that women in different‐sex couples will be more gender progressive than their partners. Method Using data from 1290 different‐sex couples married mostly in 2014 who participated in a nationally representative study in the United States, the authors identified latent classes of partners' gender ideologies using several measures. The authors then examined how latent class membership varied by sociodemographic characteristics using multinomial regression. Results Results showed five underlying latent classes: Moderate (30%), Strongly Egalitarian (20%), Nuanced Traditional (20%), Mixed (18%), and Neutral (12%). About 82% of couples in the sample consisted of two partners who shared similar views. Results showed high levels of non‐extreme stances. About 42% of couples belonged in either a Neutral class—neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the gender ideology measures—or a Moderate class. Several sociodemographic characteristics significantly predicted class membership. Conclusion Findings provide support for assortative mating—people tend to agree with their spouse on gender ideologies. Further, the findings show that although some individuals stuck “in the middle” between traditionalism and egalitarianism adopt moderate views, others seemingly adopt what the authors title firm equivocation .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13103
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is your type? Latent classes of newly married couples' gender ideologies

Erin K. Holmes, Jeremy B. Yorgason, Spencer James, Ashley Larsen Gibby et al.
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

What is your type? Latent classes of newly married couples' gender ideologies

Erin K. Holmes, Jeremy B. Yorgason, Spencer James, Ashley Larsen Gibby, Jane Lankes Smith, Aubrey Bardsley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aims to understand how married couples agree or disagree on gender ideologies, as well as what sociodemographic characteristics are related to these pairings. Background Past studies have explored the multidimensional nature of gender ideologies within individuals; however, this multidimensionality at the couple level is less understood. Although some research suggests couples will largely agree on gender ideologies, other theories imply that women in different‐sex couples will be more gender progressive than their partners. Method Using data from 1290 different‐sex couples married mostly in 2014 who participated in a nationally representative study in the United States, the authors identified latent classes of partners' gender ideologies using several measures. The authors then examined how latent class membership varied by sociodemographic characteristics using multinomial regression. Results Results showed five underlying latent classes: Moderate (30%), Strongly Egalitarian (20%), Nuanced Traditional (20%), Mixed (18%), and Neutral (12%). About 82% of couples in the sample consisted of two partners who shared similar views. Results showed high levels of non‐extreme stances. About 42% of couples belonged in either a Neutral class—neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the gender ideology measures—or a Moderate class. Several sociodemographic characteristics significantly predicted class membership. Conclusion Findings provide support for assortative mating—people tend to agree with their spouse on gender ideologies. Further, the findings show that although some individuals stuck “in the middle” between traditionalism and egalitarianism adopt moderate views, others seemingly adopt what the authors title firm equivocation .

Journal of Marriage and the FamilyVol. 87(5)
Brigham Young University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.