Feeding Tube Use and Employment

This study is concerned with the possible barriers to employment for a person who is using a feeding tube for nourishment. This narrative review will illuminate the information concerning the use of a feeding tube and returning to work after medical treatment for head and neck cancer. According to White and McBurney (2013), a narrative review involves a person telling a story first hand. The reader will hear directly from the participant in the narrative. Green et al. (2006) noted that narrative reviews written with a specific opinion can be considered commentaries, and the bias of the writer is apparent. During January 2024 to January 2025, this writer explored various databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Alt health watch, Health Source-Nursing Academic Edition, Health finder, PubMed) and yet found a paucity of information concerning people using feeding tubes and employment. Particular interest was placed on information concerning those recovering from head and neck cancer treatments, using a feeding tube, and returning to work. It seems possible that the lack of information is because returning to work has not yet been well defined. It also seems that the lack of information about people returning to work after cancer treatment is because most people are considered “fully recovered” with the feeding tube being removed before returning to work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Rehabilitation Professional
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70385/001c.132439
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeding Tube Use and Employment

Karen Linstrum
The Rehabilitation Professional
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Feeding Tube Use and Employment

Karen Linstrum
article en

Abstract

This study is concerned with the possible barriers to employment for a person who is using a feeding tube for nourishment. This narrative review will illuminate the information concerning the use of a feeding tube and returning to work after medical treatment for head and neck cancer. According to White and McBurney (2013), a narrative review involves a person telling a story first hand. The reader will hear directly from the participant in the narrative. Green et al. (2006) noted that narrative reviews written with a specific opinion can be considered commentaries, and the bias of the writer is apparent. During January 2024 to January 2025, this writer explored various databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Alt health watch, Health Source-Nursing Academic Edition, Health finder, PubMed) and yet found a paucity of information concerning people using feeding tubes and employment. Particular interest was placed on information concerning those recovering from head and neck cancer treatments, using a feeding tube, and returning to work. It seems possible that the lack of information is because returning to work has not yet been well defined. It also seems that the lack of information about people returning to work after cancer treatment is because most people are considered “fully recovered” with the feeding tube being removed before returning to work.

The Rehabilitation ProfessionalVol. 33(1)
Jackson State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feeding Tube Use and Employment — Karen Linstrum · The Rehabilitation Professional (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS