What is investigative interviewing (and what is it not)? A primer on the ethos of suspect interviewing

Purpose The questioning of suspects is central to many police investigations, and interviewing techniques have developed over time. In particular, investigative interviewing – which is a research-based and practically proven approach to gathering reliable and relevant information – is gaining ground worldwide. As a result, it is expected to be increasingly included in guidelines, training and police/legal practices around the globe. However, misconceptions and inaccuracies in defining and interpreting investigative interviewing’s practical, psychological and legal foundations can result in misunderstandings and serious consequences such as false decisions and miscarriages of justice. Therefore, this paper aims to decribe the underlying elements of investigative interviewing to offer guidance for policymakers, law enforcement decision makers, researchers and trainers. Design/methodology/approach This paper draws on existing research, as well as practical experience from interviewing, teaching, and advising, to examine what investigative interviewing is. Findings At the core of investigative interviewing are three pillars: (1) actively open-minded thinking, (2) research-based tactics and techniques and (3) a legal and humane approach. Practical implications Based on this, the present study discusses the boundaries of investigative interviewing and the chances of introducing it into training, implementing it in practice and conducting further research on effective practice. Originality/value The authors confirm that they have not submitted the manuscript elsewhere and have written it ourselves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-10-2024-0092
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is investigative interviewing (and what is it not)? A primer on the ethos of suspect interviewing

Rebecca Milne, Ray Bull, Ivar Fahsing, Steven J. Barela et al.
1 citations
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Deception detection and forensic psychology
2.44
article

What is investigative interviewing (and what is it not)? A primer on the ethos of suspect interviewing

Rebecca Milne, Ray Bull, Ivar Fahsing, Steven J. Barela, Lennart May, Christopher E. Kelly
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The questioning of suspects is central to many police investigations, and interviewing techniques have developed over time. In particular, investigative interviewing – which is a research-based and practically proven approach to gathering reliable and relevant information – is gaining ground worldwide. As a result, it is expected to be increasingly included in guidelines, training and police/legal practices around the globe. However, misconceptions and inaccuracies in defining and interpreting investigative interviewing’s practical, psychological and legal foundations can result in misunderstandings and serious consequences such as false decisions and miscarriages of justice. Therefore, this paper aims to decribe the underlying elements of investigative interviewing to offer guidance for policymakers, law enforcement decision makers, researchers and trainers. Design/methodology/approach This paper draws on existing research, as well as practical experience from interviewing, teaching, and advising, to examine what investigative interviewing is. Findings At the core of investigative interviewing are three pillars: (1) actively open-minded thinking, (2) research-based tactics and techniques and (3) a legal and humane approach. Practical implications Based on this, the present study discusses the boundaries of investigative interviewing and the chances of introducing it into training, implementing it in practice and conducting further research on effective practice. Originality/value The authors confirm that they have not submitted the manuscript elsewhere and have written it ourselves.

Journal of Criminal PsychologyVol. 16(1)
Norwegian Police University College (NO), University of Derby (GB), MSB Medical School Berlin (DE), Arab Center for International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Education (FR), Saint Joseph's University (US), University of Portsmouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.