Dynamics of change in international investment law

Abstract This article examines the ways in which international investment law evolves. It argues that its initial focus on prosperity and security, at the expense of justice and freedom, coupled with the system’s social and political dis-embeddedness, led to its current state of disenchantment. That current state of affairs is not as easily remedied as it seems. Treaty renegotiations and procedural reforms have largely been ineffective in altering the system's actual operation, reflecting a disconnect between our law-in-books perception of it and its law-in-action reality. Society has to some extent lost control over the system, and never really has had. To understand these dynamics, to facilitate meaningful reform, and ultimately to ensure that the regime better aligns with broader societal values, the article emphasizes the need for an approach drawing on complexity theory: a holistic understanding of the complex interdependencies within the system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Dispute Settlement
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf012
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of change in international investment law

Thomas Schultz, Cédric Dupont
Journal of International Dispute Settlement
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Dynamics of change in international investment law

Thomas Schultz, Cédric Dupont
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the ways in which international investment law evolves. It argues that its initial focus on prosperity and security, at the expense of justice and freedom, coupled with the system’s social and political dis-embeddedness, led to its current state of disenchantment. That current state of affairs is not as easily remedied as it seems. Treaty renegotiations and procedural reforms have largely been ineffective in altering the system's actual operation, reflecting a disconnect between our law-in-books perception of it and its law-in-action reality. Society has to some extent lost control over the system, and never really has had. To understand these dynamics, to facilitate meaningful reform, and ultimately to ensure that the regime better aligns with broader societal values, the article emphasizes the need for an approach drawing on complexity theory: a holistic understanding of the complex interdependencies within the system.

Journal of International Dispute SettlementVol. 16(2)
University of Geneva (CH), King's College London (GB), Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.