Analyzing the Relationship Between Intellectual Aptitude and Susceptibility to Cognitive Illusions

Cognitive illusions—categorized into sensation, memory, judgment and decision-making, and self-perception tasks—exploit predictive processing to induce errors. In our study, we gave 46 online participants and 48 Governor’s School of New Jersey in the Sciences (GSNJS) scholars—a group of highly motivated and academically excelling high schoolers—a survey containing 16 cognitive illusions to analyze their effects. GSNJS scholars were equally susceptible to sensory and memory tasks, less susceptible to judgment tasks, and more susceptible to self-perception tasks. Our results suggest that while GSNJS scholars demonstrate better decision-making skills than the general population, they are still equally susceptible to most cognitive illusions.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/urtc65039.2024.10937555
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing the Relationship Between Intellectual Aptitude and Susceptibility to Cognitive Illusions

Erin Li, Julia Langley, Joanna Chen, R. G. Buschman et al.
Cognitive Science and Education Research
article

Analyzing the Relationship Between Intellectual Aptitude and Susceptibility to Cognitive Illusions

Erin Li, Julia Langley, Joanna Chen, R. G. Buschman, Arturo E. Hernández, Laura J Samuel, S. Desai, Emily Ho, Yeji Kim, R. Venkatesh, Holly Sajdak, Grant Rupinski
article en

Abstract

Cognitive illusions—categorized into sensation, memory, judgment and decision-making, and self-perception tasks—exploit predictive processing to induce errors. In our study, we gave 46 online participants and 48 Governor’s School of New Jersey in the Sciences (GSNJS) scholars—a group of highly motivated and academically excelling high schoolers—a survey containing 16 cognitive illusions to analyze their effects. GSNJS scholars were equally susceptible to sensory and memory tasks, less susceptible to judgment tasks, and more susceptible to self-perception tasks. Our results suggest that while GSNJS scholars demonstrate better decision-making skills than the general population, they are still equally susceptible to most cognitive illusions.

Novartis, Overdeck Family Foundation, Office of the Secretary
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Cognitive Science and Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.