Deep Learning for Steganographic Image Detection

Steganography is often difficult to detect, especially when applied to images, as alterations to the image are minimal and often imperceptible to the human eye. To address these obstacles, we trained EfficientNetV2-S, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model optimized for efficiency, for steganography detection. Using a CNN allows for flexibility as it can train on subtle features created by steganographic methods and differentiate between them and clean images. We find that our fine-tuned model is able to differentiate between clean images and certain classes of steganographically altered images with an accuracy of up to 98 percent. Notably, our model is able to distinguish between four methods of steganographic alteration and clean images with a 66.29 percent accuracy, demonstrating a new capability in the field of steganalysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/urtc65039.2024.10937610
Primary Topic
Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning for Steganographic Image Detection

William M. Shih, A Larsen Christian, Jonathan Pai, Savannah Alanis et al.
Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
article

Deep Learning for Steganographic Image Detection

William M. Shih, A Larsen Christian, Jonathan Pai, Savannah Alanis, Daniel Guo, C Qiao, Leon Lenk, Renuka Bhusari, Zachary DeSoto, Iryna Iziumska, Jishan Kharbanda
article en

Abstract

Steganography is often difficult to detect, especially when applied to images, as alterations to the image are minimal and often imperceptible to the human eye. To address these obstacles, we trained EfficientNetV2-S, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model optimized for efficiency, for steganography detection. Using a CNN allows for flexibility as it can train on subtle features created by steganographic methods and differentiate between them and clean images. We find that our fine-tuned model is able to differentiate between clean images and certain classes of steganographically altered images with an accuracy of up to 98 percent. Notably, our model is able to distinguish between four methods of steganographic alteration and clean images with a 66.29 percent accuracy, demonstrating a new capability in the field of steganalysis.

University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deep Learning for Steganographic Image Detection — William M. Shih, A Larsen Christian, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS