Comparative effect of bupivacaine local anesthesia with ropivacaine present with fentanyl

Local anesthetics for lower limb anesthesia frequently use ropivacaine and bupivacaine due to their unique pharmacological properties. The point of this study was to look at how well efficacy of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl worked in spinal anesthesia and compare and talk about them. Each group evaluated a total of 30 patients using various parameters to assess side effects and complications. We found among patients receiving bupivacaine, 70.0% did not require rescue medication, whereas 30.0% did. In contrast, among patients receiving ropivacaine, 86.7% did not require rescue medication, while 13.3% did. Thus, found non-significant difference. Bupivacaine has a faster onset and longer duration of sensory block and motor block, providing better early pain alleviation than ropivacaine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300210426
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effect of bupivacaine local anesthesia with ropivacaine present with fentanyl

Anami Gour, P. B. Jamale, V. M. Joshi
1 citations
Bioinformation
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
article

Comparative effect of bupivacaine local anesthesia with ropivacaine present with fentanyl

Anami Gour, P. B. Jamale, V. M. Joshi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Local anesthetics for lower limb anesthesia frequently use ropivacaine and bupivacaine due to their unique pharmacological properties. The point of this study was to look at how well efficacy of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl worked in spinal anesthesia and compare and talk about them. Each group evaluated a total of 30 patients using various parameters to assess side effects and complications. We found among patients receiving bupivacaine, 70.0% did not require rescue medication, whereas 30.0% did. In contrast, among patients receiving ropivacaine, 86.7% did not require rescue medication, while 13.3% did. Thus, found non-significant difference. Bupivacaine has a faster onset and longer duration of sensory block and motor block, providing better early pain alleviation than ropivacaine.

BioinformationVol. 21(3)
Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative effect of bupivacaine local anesthesia with ropivacaine present with fentanyl — Anami Gour, P. B. Jamale, et al. · Bioinformation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS